Transition-Aware Routing in Hybrid Hollow-Core/Single-Mode Fiber Networks: A Cost--Throughput Investigation

Md Ghulam Saber, Zhiping Jiang

Incremental deployment of hollow-core fiber (HCF) in single-mode-fiber (SMF) networks introduces a routing tradeoff: reducing HCF-SMF transitions can improve physical-layer feasibility, but overly transition-averse routing incurs harmful path detours. We study this tradeoff using a common event-driven simulator that compares six protected routing schemes spanning fiber-blind, generalized signal-to-noise ratio (GSNR)-aware, and explicitly transition-aware designs on hybrid HCF/SMF topologies. The model includes a per-transition GSNR penalty and an exploratory splice-failure availability term. Across six reference topologies, five HCF deployment fractions, and dynamic loads at 300 Erlang, the strongest transition minimizers, transition-penalty-aware routing (TPAR) and the GSNR/fiber-transition joint scheme (GFJ), halve the mean transition count at a 20-25% carried-traffic penalty. Among the intermediate designs, GSNR- maximal routing with transition-aware reranking (GMR-T) cuts transitions by approximately 22% relative to distance-adaptive routing and spectrum assignment (DA-RSA) at a 3% throughput cost, while bounded-detour TPAR (BD-TPAR) cuts transitions by approximately 11% at only a 1% cost. Deployment pattern also matters: contiguous HCF rollout lowers transitions by approximately 40% on average while improving carried traffic, reducing the benefit of aggressive transition-aware routing. These results support BD-TPAR as a practical default under fragmented deployment, GMR-T as a lower-complexity alternative, and TPAR or GFJ only where the external cost of transitions is high.