CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.ROcs.AI2026-07-06

Do Vision-Language-Action Models Mean What They Say? On the Role of Faithfulness in Embodied Reasoning

Matthew Foutter, Matteo Cercola, Lena Wild, Yunshan Wang, Michelle Li, Daniele Gammelli, Marco Pavone

Embodied Chain-of-Thought has emerged as a promising mechanism to enhance robot decision-making and interpretability in black-box Vision-Language Action (VLA) models. However, whether this verbalized Chain-of-Thought truthfully reflects the policy's underlying decision process remains poorly understood. We distinguish between functional reasoning, in which reasoning improves task performance, and faithful reasoning, in which reasoning truly reflects the policy's internal decision process. We argue that SoTA alignment strategies offer a necessary but insufficient notion of faithfulness, admitting reasoning whose intermediate steps can mask the causal links in action prediction through confounding factors (e.g., reasoning that is ungrounded in the environment and internally disconnected or inconsistent), restricting policy generalization. We study this gap through a human evaluation of a SoTA reasoning model for autonomous driving, revealing an inconsistent coupling between reasoning quality and downstream trajectory improvement. We then operationalize a behavioral surrogate for embodied faithfulness through a learned critic, Pinocchio, scoring observation grounding and stepwise coherence, and use this critic as a dense reward signal in post-training an embodied policy with reinforcement learning. Across withheld driving benchmarks, our post-trained planner improves faithfulness by 4% and 18% over SoTA alignment and trajectory error post-training baselines, respectively, while maintaining competitive downstream task performance. Finally, on a synthetic out-of-distribution test set, post-training for faithfulness improves policy responsiveness to rare counterfactual scenarios by 1.6x that of a SoTA policy, suggesting that faithful reasoning traces contribute to more robust, generalizable, and interpretable embodied intelligence. Project page: https://mjf-su.github.io/pinocchio/

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIcs.CVcs.RO2026-07-16

Action QFormer: Structured Representation Shaping under Action Supervision in Vision-Language-Action Models

Yufeng Ji, Wenhao Tang, Haoyi Niu, Koushil Sreenath, Yi Wu, Zhongyu Li

Action supervision in vision-language-action (VLA) models is often treated as a downstream objective for learning action prediction. In this paper, we study it instead as a force that shapes inherited multimodal representations. We show that this shaping has a dual effect: it is…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.RO2026-07-15

RxBrain: Embodied Cognition Foundation Model with Joint Language-Visual Reasoning and Imagination

Haotian Liang, Mingkang Chen, Yufei Huang, Yuchun Guo, Xiaomeng Zhu, Xiangli Shi, et al.

Embodied cognition requires agents to connect high-level task reasoning with the physical states to be achieved. We introduce Hy-Embodied-RxBrain, an embodied cognition foundation model with joint language-visual reasoning and imagination. Unlike vision-language models that empha…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.CRcs.LG2026-07-20

Reasoning as a Double-Edged Sword: Architecture and Cross-Stage Robustness in Vision-Language-Action Models

Tuan Duong Trinh, Naveed Akhtar, Basim Azam

Does adding a reasoning step make a Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model more robust to perturbation? Intuitively, a policy that reasons before acting should absorb a perturbed input better than one that maps observations directly to actions. We test this premise head-on across thr…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.RO2026-07-18

What Do They See? Interpreting Complex Road Scenarios Through the Eyes of Vision-Language-Action Models for Safe and Trustworthy Autonomous Vehicle Learning

Kalpana Panda, Wesley Maia, Vinti Agarwal, Ross Greer

End-to-end autonomous driving models are now able to navigate complex road scenarios, mapping raw sensor observations directly to observed paths for open-loop evaluation and often effective driving in closed-loop evaluation. Yet the internal logic of these safety-critical systems…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AI2026-07-17

Think at 5 Hz, Act at 20 Hz: Asynchronous Fast-Slow Vision-Language-Action Inference for Closed-Loop Driving

Yun Li, Jiachen Gong, Simon Thompson, Ehsan Javanmardi, Qunli Zhang, Zifan Zeng, et al.

Large language models bring instruction following and scene reasoning to end-to-end driving, but their inference latency collides with the control rate a vehicle requires. Existing closed-loop agents hide this gap by invoking the model on alternate simulation ticks and replaying…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AI2026-07-13

See like a Robot: Robot-Centric Pointmaps for Vision-Language-Action Models

Byungkun Lee, Dongyoon Hwang, Dongjin Kim, Hojoon Lee, Minho Park, Jaegul Choo

Vision-language-action (VLA) models predict robot actions from visual observations and language instructions. These actions are defined in the robot's own 3D coordinate frame, yet most VLAs observe the scene in the camera frame, creating a frame mismatch between where the scene i…

View free PDFSource page