CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.ROcs.AI2026-07-17

Think at 5 Hz, Act at 20 Hz: Asynchronous Fast-Slow Vision-Language-Action Inference for Closed-Loop Driving

Yun Li, Jiachen Gong, Simon Thompson, Ehsan Javanmardi, Qunli Zhang, Zifan Zeng, Shiming Liu, Peng Wang, Zixuan Guo, Manabu Tsukada

Large language models bring instruction following and scene reasoning to end-to-end driving, but their inference latency collides with the control rate a vehicle requires. Existing closed-loop agents hide this gap by invoking the model on alternate simulation ticks and replaying the previous command in between, so half of all control outputs ignore the newest observations. We present a fast-slow architecture that removes this compromise. A frozen 7B vision-language backbone acts as the slow system, digesting navigation instructions and visual history at low frequency while exposing its per-layer key-value cache as a standing representation of the scene. A lightweight action expert acts as the fast system, attending to this cache and to the current camera frame at every simulation tick to regress waypoints in a single forward pass. Since the cache lags behind the world at deployment, we train the expert under randomized staleness, aligning training with asynchronous execution. On LangAuto-Short routes in CARLA, our system produces fresh control at every 50 ms simulation tick and lifts route completion from 37.0 to 94.0 over the frame-skipping baseline. A frame-skip ablation with the same expert separates the two factors at work: the expert raises the driving score on its own, while per-tick freshness raises completion from 82.1 to 94.0 and cuts red-light violations by a third. Trained on a single town, the expert transfers zero-shot to two unseen towns, holding 84-94% route completion where the baseline reaches 31-41%. It reduces open-loop waypoint error by nearly a factor of four compared to the backbone's own action head, at a per-tick model cost of 32 ms that is independent of history length on a single consumer GPU.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.CVcs.LG2026-07-12

Action Map Policy: Learning 3D Closed-loop Manipulation via Pixel Classification

Haojie Huang, Zhang Ye, Linfeng Zhao, Boce Hu, Mingxi Jia, Yu Qi, et al.

The action space poses a major challenge in robot learning, since it is often high-dimensional, can span long time horizons, and frequently admits multi-modal optimal solutions. A good choice of action representation and loss function can help to address these concerns, but there…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.RO2026-07-18

What Do They See? Interpreting Complex Road Scenarios Through the Eyes of Vision-Language-Action Models for Safe and Trustworthy Autonomous Vehicle Learning

Kalpana Panda, Wesley Maia, Vinti Agarwal, Ross Greer

End-to-end autonomous driving models are now able to navigate complex road scenarios, mapping raw sensor observations directly to observed paths for open-loop evaluation and often effective driving in closed-loop evaluation. Yet the internal logic of these safety-critical systems…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AI2026-07-13

See like a Robot: Robot-Centric Pointmaps for Vision-Language-Action Models

Byungkun Lee, Dongyoon Hwang, Dongjin Kim, Hojoon Lee, Minho Park, Jaegul Choo

Vision-language-action (VLA) models predict robot actions from visual observations and language instructions. These actions are defined in the robot's own 3D coordinate frame, yet most VLAs observe the scene in the camera frame, creating a frame mismatch between where the scene i…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CVcs.RO2026-07-16

Action QFormer: Structured Representation Shaping under Action Supervision in Vision-Language-Action Models

Yufeng Ji, Wenhao Tang, Haoyi Niu, Koushil Sreenath, Yi Wu, Zhongyu Li

Action supervision in vision-language-action (VLA) models is often treated as a downstream objective for learning action prediction. In this paper, we study it instead as a force that shapes inherited multimodal representations. We show that this shaping has a dual effect: it is…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.CRcs.LG2026-07-20

Reasoning as a Double-Edged Sword: Architecture and Cross-Stage Robustness in Vision-Language-Action Models

Tuan Duong Trinh, Naveed Akhtar, Basim Azam

Does adding a reasoning step make a Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model more robust to perturbation? Intuitively, a policy that reasons before acting should absorb a perturbed input better than one that maps observations directly to actions. We test this premise head-on across thr…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AI2026-07-11

ActiveFly-Bench: Aligning Embodied Question Answering with Vision-Language-Action for Aerial Embodied Perception

Weichen Zhang, Shiquan Yu, Yinan Zhu, Peizhi Tang, Shilong Ji, Zhiyuan Deng, et al.

We introduce ActiveFly-Bench, the first benchmark to bridge cyberspace reasoning and physical-world interaction for UAV embodied perception. The benchmark decomposes active perception into three hierarchical tasks: Aerial Embodied Question Answering (Air-EQA), Observation Behavio…

View free PDFSource page