CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AIcs.RO2026-07-15

RxBrain: Embodied Cognition Foundation Model with Joint Language-Visual Reasoning and Imagination

Haotian Liang, Mingkang Chen, Yufei Huang, Yuchun Guo, Xiaomeng Zhu, Xiangli Shi, Kaixuan Wang, Yunxuan Mao, Weijie Zhou, Ling Chen, Shirong Zeng, Yueyu Long, Yuchen Si, Yajuan Zhu, Xingyu Zhou, Minghui Wang, Wanjia He, Xin Yang, Lingzhu Xiang, Zhiqing Liu, Bohan Ma, Xiran Huang, Tianshuo Yang, Zhiheng Liu, Xuantang Xiong, Zisheng Lu, Ping Luo, Yao Mu, Han Hu, Zhengyou Zhang

Embodied cognition requires agents to connect high-level task reasoning with the physical states to be achieved. We introduce Hy-Embodied-RxBrain, an embodied cognition foundation model with joint language-visual reasoning and imagination. Unlike vision-language models that emphasize scene understanding and textual decision making, or generative world models that mainly predict future visual states, RxBrain represents embodied plans in a single planning sequence where language and visual imagination play complementary roles. Language provides the abstract structure of a plan, including task decomposition, planning primitives, constraints, temporal order, and decision logic, while visual imagination grounds this structure through world state prediction and joint subgoal planning, associating each planning step with intermediate and final physical states. RxBrain adopts a unified multimodal Mixture-of-Transformers architecture that supports language, image, and video understanding and generation within one model. To train this capability, we build an automatic pipeline that converts embodied videos into joint text-visual planning supervision by decomposing videos into planning steps and aligning them with visual state transitions. We further introduce RxBrain-Bench to evaluate whether models can represent embodied plans through joint textual and visual components rather than separate understanding or generation. Experiments show that RxBrain maintains embodied understanding and generation abilities, and produces plans with coupled textual reasoning, world state prediction, and joint subgoal planning. We also extend RxBrain to continuous robot action generation, where it shows promising real-robot performance without large-scale action-data pretraining. These results provide an initial step toward foundation models for embodied cognition.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.RO2026-07-11

ABot-N1: Toward a General Visual Language Navigation Foundation Model

Ruiyan Gong, Yingnan Guo, Junjun Hu, Jintao Kong, Xiaoxu Leng, Tianlun Li, et al.

Visual Language Navigation foundation models aim to unify deep reasoning for grounded spatial decisions with broad versatility for diverse embodied tasks. Current approaches typically achieve this integration via monolithic policies that map observations directly to actions, yet…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AI2026-07-13

Xiaomi-Robotics-U0: Unified Embodied Synthesis with World Foundation Model

Xinghang Li, Jun Guo, Qiwei Li, Long Qian, Hang Lai, Yueze Wang, et al.

Recent foundation image and video generation models offer strong generalization and controllability, but their direct application to embodied scenarios is limited by requirements for multi-view consistency, geometric coherence, and robot embodiment constraints. Existing methods t…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AI2026-07-06

Do Vision-Language-Action Models Mean What They Say? On the Role of Faithfulness in Embodied Reasoning

Matthew Foutter, Matteo Cercola, Lena Wild, Yunshan Wang, Michelle Li, Daniele Gammelli, et al.

Embodied Chain-of-Thought has emerged as a promising mechanism to enhance robot decision-making and interpretability in black-box Vision-Language Action (VLA) models. However, whether this verbalized Chain-of-Thought truthfully reflects the policy's underlying decision process re…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AI2026-07-08

GemNav: Discrete-Token Visual Robot Navigation using a Multimodal Large Language Model

Peter Bohm, Saimunur Rahman, Abdelwahed Khamis, Sagun Man Singh Shrestha, Chris McCool, Peyman Moghadam

Visual navigation policies built on large pretrained models have so far followed a common recipe: a dedicated visual encoder, a bespoke action head, and training on thousands of hours of cross-embodiment datasets. We ask whether this recipe is necessary. In this paper, we introdu…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.CRcs.LG2026-07-20

Reasoning as a Double-Edged Sword: Architecture and Cross-Stage Robustness in Vision-Language-Action Models

Tuan Duong Trinh, Naveed Akhtar, Basim Azam

Does adding a reasoning step make a Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model more robust to perturbation? Intuitively, a policy that reasons before acting should absorb a perturbed input better than one that maps observations directly to actions. We test this premise head-on across thr…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AI2026-06-28

Position: Vision-Language-Action Models Cannot Be Verified to Perform Physical Reasoning

Taozhao Chen, Ian Manchester, Huaming Chen

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) systems, built on pretrained vision-language models (VLMs), have shown rapidly improving performance on robot manipulation benchmarks. These gains are commonly interpreted as evidence that semantic representations learned from internet-scale data tran…

View free PDFSource page