CORTEXA
← Browse
openalexWater2026-07-25Cited by 0

Physics-Informed CNN-LSTM for Street-Scale Urban Flood Prediction: Reconciling Aggregate Accuracy and Street-Level Plausibility

Luc D’Costa, Yidi Wang, Jonathan L. Goodall, Rohan Chandra

Deep learning surrogate models trained with mean-squared-error loss produce statistically accurate but physically unconstrained flood predictions: water may flow uphill, appear spontaneously, or smooth over street-level corridors. In this work, a physics-informed training framework is developed for CNN-LSTM models that predict urban flood depths at 15 min intervals over a 128×128 spatial grid. Three differentiable penalty terms are embedded directly into the loss function: (i) a gravity loss that penalizes depth increases against the water-surface-elevation gradient, (ii) a continuity loss enforcing local mass conservation with rainfall-adaptive thresholds, and (iii) a topography-aware false-alarm penalty modulated by the topographic wetness index (TWI). The framework is evaluated on the Norfolk, Virginia, flood dataset spanning two major storm events (August 2017 and September 2022) comprising 300 samples, with all variants trained on identical splits and robustness assessed over repeated random splits and leave-one-storm-out tests. A road-proximal evaluation restricted to a TWI-derived street mask quantifies street-level skill. The physics-constrained model achieves near-zero gravity violations (∼10−6) and the highest street-channel recall (0.77 ± 0.09 versus 0.44 ± 0.10 for the unconstrained baseline), the capability most relevant to downstream traffic routing, and its recall advantage more than doubles on a held-out storm, while a uniform false-alarm variant attains 16% lower mean absolute error but suppresses street recall to 0.25. The proposed TWI-modulated penalty reconciles this trade-off: it improves upon the uniform variant on every metric measured, recovering 60% higher street recall at the lowest MAE among all constrained variants and the best street-level F1 score. These results expose a fundamental tension between aggregate pixel-level error metrics and application-specific physical plausibility, and demonstrate that terrain-aware loss modulation offers a principled resolution.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

crossrefWater2026-04-14

Benchmarking Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Groundwater Level Prediction in Karst Aquifers: The Dominant Role of Hydrogeological Complexity

Qingmin Zhu, Yinxia Zhu, Jie Niu, Jinqiang Huang, Fen Huang, Xiangyang Zhou, et al.

Karst aquifers present unique challenges for groundwater level prediction due to their dual-porosity structures and highly nonlinear hydrological responses. This study systematically evaluates nine machine learning and deep learning models (RF, XGBoost, LSTM, CNN, Transformer, N-…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefWater2024-01-15Cited by 26

Comparative Analysis of Convolutional Neural Network-Long Short-Term Memory, Sparrow Search Algorithm-Backpropagation Neural Network, and Particle Swarm Optimization-Extreme Learning Machine Models for the Water Discharge of the Buzău River, Romania

Liu Zhen, Alina Bărbulescu

Modeling and forecasting the river flow is essential for the management of water resources. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of different models built for the monthly water discharge of the Buzău River (Romania), measured in the upper part of the riv…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefWater2024-07-22Cited by 36

A Critical Review of Emerging Technologies for Flash Flood Prediction: Examining Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Internet of Things, Cloud Computing, and Robotics Techniques

Ghazi Al-Rawas, Mohammad Reza Nikoo, Malik Al-Wardy, Talal Etri

There has been growing interest in the application of smart technologies for hazard management. However, very limited studies have reviewed the trends of such technologies in the context of flash floods. This study reviews innovative technologies such as artificial intelligence (…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefWater2024-10-12Cited by 5

Pipeline Leak Identification and Prediction of Urban Water Supply Network System with Deep Learning Artificial Neural Network

Fei Xi, Luyi Liu, Liyu Shan, Bingjun Liu, Yuanfeng Qi

Pipeline leakage, which leads to water wastage, financial losses, and contamination, is a significant challenge in urban water supply networks. Leak detection and prediction is urgent to secure the safety of the water supply system. Relaying on deep learning artificial neural net…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefWater2023-07-09Cited by 35

An Improved Flood Susceptibility Assessment in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, Using Advanced Machine Learning Techniques

Abdulnoor A. J. Ghanim, Ahmad Shaf, Tariq Ali, Maryam Zafar, Ahmed M. Al-Areeq, Saleh H. Alyami, et al.

The city of Jeddah experienced a severe flood in 2020, resulting in loss of life and damage to property. In such scenarios, a flood forecasting model can play a crucial role in predicting flood events and minimizing their impact on communities. The proposed study aims to evaluate…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefWater2025-06-23Cited by 10

Comparative Analysis of Machine/Deep Learning Models for Single-Step and Multi-Step Forecasting in River Water Quality Time Series

Hongzhe Fang, Tianhong Li, Huiting Xian

There is a lack of a systematic comparison framework that can assess models in both single-step and multi-step forecasting situations while balancing accuracy, training efficiency, and prediction horizon. This study aims to evaluate the predictive capabilities of machine learning…

View free PDFSource page