CORTEXA
← Browse
crossrefWater2025-06-23Cited by 10

Comparative Analysis of Machine/Deep Learning Models for Single-Step and Multi-Step Forecasting in River Water Quality Time Series

Hongzhe Fang, Tianhong Li, Huiting Xian

There is a lack of a systematic comparison framework that can assess models in both single-step and multi-step forecasting situations while balancing accuracy, training efficiency, and prediction horizon. This study aims to evaluate the predictive capabilities of machine learning and deep learning models in water quality time series forecasting. It made use of 22-month data with a 4 h interval from two monitoring stations located in a tributary of the Pearl River. Six models, specifically Support Vector Regression (SVR), XGBoost, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Network, Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and PatchTST, were employed in this study. In single-step forecasting, LSTM Network achieved superior accuracy for a univariate feature set and attained an overall 22.0% (Welch’s t-test, p = 3.03 × 10−7) reduction in Mean Squared Error (MSE) compared with the machine learning models (SVR, XGBoost, KNN), while RNN demonstrated significantly reduced training time. For a multivariate feature set, the deep learning models exhibited comparable accuracy but with no model achieving a significant increase in accuracy compared to the univariate scenario. The KNN model underperformed across error evaluation metrics, with the lowest accuracy, and the XGBoost model exhibited the highest computational complexity. In multi-step forecasting, the direct multi-step PatchTST model outperformed the iterated multi-step models (RNN, LSTM, GRU), with a reduced time-delay effect and a slower decrease in accuracy with increasing prediction length, but it still required specific adjustments to be better suited for the task of river water quality time series forecasting. The findings provide actionable guidelines for model selection, balancing predictive accuracy, training efficiency, and forecasting horizon requirements in environmental time series analysis.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

openalexWater2026-07-26

A Machine Learning Approach for Water Quality Assessment in the Lower Rio Grande Valley Watershed

Saika Nowshin Nowrin, Chu‐Lin Cheng, Jungseok Ho, Jinwoo An, Fatemeh Nazari

Water quality analysis plays an essential role in maintaining the health and sustainability of river ecosystems, especially in semi-arid regions like the Arroyo Colorado Watershed in South Texas. Since the river is a vital source of water supply for local communities, agriculture…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefWater2024-01-15Cited by 26

Comparative Analysis of Convolutional Neural Network-Long Short-Term Memory, Sparrow Search Algorithm-Backpropagation Neural Network, and Particle Swarm Optimization-Extreme Learning Machine Models for the Water Discharge of the Buzău River, Romania

Liu Zhen, Alina Bărbulescu

Modeling and forecasting the river flow is essential for the management of water resources. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of different models built for the monthly water discharge of the Buzău River (Romania), measured in the upper part of the riv…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefWater2024-07-25Cited by 9

Temporal Dynamics and Predictive Modelling of Streamflow and Water Quality Using Advanced Statistical and Ensemble Machine Learning Techniques

Syeda Zehan Farzana, Dev Raj Paudyal, Sreeni Chadalavada, Md Jahangir Alam

Changes in water quality are closely linked to seasonal fluctuations in streamflow, and a thorough understanding of how these variations interact across different time scales is important for the efficient management of surface water bodies such as rivers, lakes, and reservoirs.…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefWater2024-06-12Cited by 19

Advanced Machine Learning and Water Quality Index (WQI) Assessment: Evaluating Groundwater Quality at the Yopurga Landfill

Hongmei Zheng, Shiwei Hou, Jing Liu, Yanna Xiong, Yuxin Wang

As industrial development and population growth continue, water pollution has become increasingly severe, particularly in rapidly industrializing regions like the area surrounding the Yopurga landfill. Ensuring water resource safety and environmental protection necessitates effec…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefWater2023-07-13Cited by 218

Advanced Machine Learning Techniques to Improve Hydrological Prediction: A Comparative Analysis of Streamflow Prediction Models

Vijendra Kumar, Naresh Kedam, Kul Vaibhav Sharma, Darshan J. Mehta, Tommaso Caloiero

The management of water resources depends heavily on hydrological prediction, and advances in machine learning (ML) present prospects for improving predictive modelling capabilities. This study investigates the use of a variety of widely used machine learning algorithms, such as…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefWater2024-11-05Cited by 5

Machine Learning Based Inversion of Water Quality Parameters in Typical Reach of Rural Wetland by Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Images

Na Zeng, Libang Ma, Hao Zheng, Yihui Zhao, Zhicheng He, Susu Deng, et al.

Rural wetlands are complex landscapes where rivers, croplands, and villages coexist, making water quality monitoring crucial for the well-being of nearby residents. UAV-based imagery has proven effective in capturing detailed features of water bodies, making it a popular tool for…

View free PDFSource page