CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CRcs.CLcs.LG2026-07-23

Adversarial Prompts for Acceptance Collapse in Speculative Decoding

Run Wang, Chaoyi Zhou, Xi Liu, Yi Zhu, Amir Salarpour, Pedram MohajerAnsari, Zhi-Qi Cheng, Feng Luo, Siyu Huang, Mert D. Pesé

Lossless acceleration schemes, such as speculative decoding, promise significant inference speedups by relying on dynamic token-level alignment between a draft and a target model. However, this guarantee of semantic equivalence masks a severe operational vulnerability: draft-target alignment can be systematically attacked. In this paper, we introduce ADSD, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first prompt-suffix attack that collapses verifier acceptance by pushing draft probability mass toward tokens the target is unlikely to accept. ADSD uses Soft-Collapse, a verifier-aligned surrogate derived from the asymmetric speculative acceptance rule, together with a target-preservation objective that discourages obvious task corruption. ADSD successfully generates highly effective adversarial suffixes. On the GSM8K dataset, our attack increases the mean sample time by 62.3% while preserving the task quality. We further show that this vulnerability exists across different domains, speculative decoding strategies, and model architectures.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CRcs.CLcs.LG2026-07-11

One Token Is Enough: Fingerprinting and Verifying Large Language Models from Single-Token Output Distributions

Tomas Bruckner

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly consumed through opaque serving chains - API aggregators, resellers, and inference providers - in which the client has no technical means to confirm that the model answering is the model advertised, and recent audits show that a subst…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.CRcs.LG2026-07-02

HaloGuard 1.0: An Open Weights Constitutional Classifier for Multilingual AI Safety

Navaneeth Sangameswaran, Preetham S, Ashmiya Lenin

We present HaloGuard 1.0, an open-weights implementation of the constitutional-classifier paradigm for input safety. It achieves state-of-the-art performance on English and multilingual prompt-safety benchmarks at roughly one-tenth the model size of current leading open guard mod…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CLcs.CR2026-07-08

Efficient Safety Alignment of Language Models via Latent Personality Traits

Mohamed Amine Merzouk, Nolan Smyth, Damiano Fornasiere, Linh Le, David Williams-King, Adam Oberman

Current safety methods for large language models are known to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, motivating research into robust alternatives. Latent Adversarial Training (LAT) is among the most effective defenses, but can degrade utility and requires training on large dataset…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CLcs.CR2026-07-01

Black-Box Inference of LLM Architectural Properties with Restrictive API Access

Christopher Ellis, Shreyas Chaudhari, Mei-Yu Wang, Leighton Barnes, Giulia Fanti, José M. F. Moura

In practice, most commercial LLM providers do not publicly release details of underlying LLM architectures. However, prior work has shown that given limited API access to an LLM (namely, top-$k$ logits and/or a logit bias function), one can recover certain architectural details o…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.CRcs.LG2026-07-06

Retroactive Chain-of-Thought (RetroCoT): Forensic Reconstruction Prompts as a Safety Diagnostic Across Model Generations

Samira Hajizadeh

Safety alignment in large language models is typically evaluated against direct, imperative harmful requests. We show that this alignment is highly conditioned on pragmatic register: models that refuse a direct request frequently comply when the same underlying objective is expre…

View free PDFSource page