CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CV2026-07-16

WorkDrive: Roadwork Chain of Causation for Autonomous Driving

Tianyi Jiang, Wen Zhang, Sihan Yang, Ming Lu, Wentao Zhang

Autonomous driving vision-language models (VLMs) struggle in roadwork zones, where familiar visual cues such as lane markings and permanent signs are altered or absent, and temporary devices such as cones and barriers redefine the drivable corridor. VLMs can detect these objects, but without explicit guidance they anchor their reasoning on familiar elements from pre-training and fail to connect work-zone observations to correct planning decisions. We propose WorkDrive, a framework that constructs perception-grounded causal reasoning for work zones and aligns it with trajectory prediction. An automated multitask perception pipeline extracts structured scene facts and injects them into a Chain-of-Causation (CoC) annotation pipeline, redirecting the annotator's attention to domain-specific elements. The resulting reasoning labels are used for supervised fine-tuning, followed by reinforcement learning with a single reward: consistency between lateral meta-actions and the predicted trajectory. On ROADWork, the largest public work-zone dataset, the proposed roadwork CoC reduces trajectory average displacement error (ADE) by 9.0\%, and consistency-based GRPO yields a further 3.0\%, achieving progressive improvement over the trajectory-only baseline. Code and data will be publicly released.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CV2026-06-30

Reasoning-aware Speculative Decoding for Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models in Autonomous Driving

Anh Dung Dinh, Simon Khan, Flora Salim

Modern Vision-Language-Action (VLA) planners for autonomous driving emit a chain-of-causation (CoC) reasoning step \emph{before} producing a trajectory. The reasoning is autoregressive and dominates inference latency, while the trajectory head is parallel and cheap. Latency is an…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CV2026-06-30

DriveWeaver: Point-Conditioned Video Inpainting for Controllable Vehicle Insertion in Autonomous Driving Simulation

Junzhe Jiang, Zipei Ma, Zijie Pan, Li Zhang

A pivotal step in autonomous driving simulation involves inserting foreground vehicles with predefined trajectories into simulated scenes. This process enhances scene diversity and facilitates the creation of various corner cases for testing and improving autonomous driving model…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.CVcs.LG2026-06-29

Learning from Mistakes: Rollout-Retrieval Lifelong Policy Learning for Autonomous Driving

Cheng Gong, Haoyang Wang, Chao Lu, Zirui Li, Jianwei Gong

Autonomous driving policies should be able to improve continually as deployment exposes them to increasingly diverse and long-tail traffic situations. However, most learning-based policies are trained or fine-tuned on expert demonstrations and then rely largely on generalization…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.CVeess.SY2026-07-06

VLM-CASE: Vision-Language Model Enabled Context-Adaptive Safety Envelopes for Anticipatory Safe Autonomous Driving

Tianjia Yang, Ke Li, Ruwen Qin, Xianbiao Hu

Adverse driving conditions, such as bad weather, remain a principal barrier to autonomous driving because they degrade two things at once: what the vehicle can perceive and what it can physically do. Human drivers cope by anticipation, reasoning about the scene and re-budgeting s…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CV2026-07-01

DriveVer: Lightweight Trajectory Evaluator as Test-Time Verifier for Autonomous Driving

Chong He, Yuechen Luo, Fang Li, Shaoqing Xu, Fuxi Wen

End-to-end autonomous driving models often encounter performance bottlenecks, as training-time scaling leads to high computational costs and diminishing marginal returns. Existing planners typically adopt a one-shot generation paradigm, lacking secondary validation and active cor…

View free PDFSource page