CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CV2026-07-07

Structured-Condensed Prompt Tuning in Vision-Language Models for Fine-grained Image Recognition

Xinda Liu, Qinyu Zhang, Weiqing Min, Guohua Geng, Shuqiang Jiang

Fine-grained image recognition poses a significant challenge due to the substantial expertise and effort required for manual annotation. Vision-language models (VLMs) like CLIP provide a compelling zero-shot alternative, reducing reliance on extensive labeled data. However, their ability to capture subtle distinctions remains limited, leading to subpar recognition performance. While prompt tuning has proven effective for adapting VLMs, most existing methods treat class labels as isolated, discrete entities, overlooking the rich semantic relationships between them. This oversimplified assumption limits the model's ability to capture hierarchical dependencies and inter-class correlations -- both critical for distinguishing visually similar categories. The problem is especially acute in fine-grained classification, where accurate recognition depends on understanding complex label semantics. To address this, we propose Structured-Condensed Prompt Tuning (SCPT), which enhances semantic structure modeling in prompt learning. Specifically, we introduce Semantic Relation Encoding (SRE) to explicitly model inter-class semantic topology and encode structured label relationships. In parallel, we design a Semantic Condensation loss (ScLoss) to suppress redundant supervision and extract discriminative components from the global semantic space. Together, these components significantly improve semantic alignment and fine-grained discrimination. Extensive experiments on 14 fine-grained benchmarks show that SCPT effectively mitigates semantic ambiguity and achieves state-of-the-art performance in both few-shot and base-to-novel generalization settings.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CVcs.AI2026-07-23

When Are Reasoning-Based Guardrails Not Efficient? ResponseGuard: A Fast Vision-Language Guard for Real-Time Moderation

Dongbin Na

A vision-language AI assistant returns its answer as a stream of generated tokens. Therefore, a safety guard that watches that answer has to keep up with the stream and stop a harmful reply before a user reads it. Recent vision-language guardrails instead generate a chain of thou…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CV2026-07-17

Region-Grounded Vision-Language Learning for Detection-Guided Mammographic Lesion Classification

Zhengbo Zhou, Jiren Li, Dooman Arefan, Margarita Zuley, Shandong Wu

Vision-language models trained with contrastive objectives have shown promise in medical image analysis. However, conventional global image-text alignment is ill-suited for mammography, where diagnostically relevant lesions are spatially localized and occupy only a small fraction…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGeess.IV2026-07-17

Ask Twice, Look Twice: Prompt Echoing Resolves the Question-First Paradox in Vision-Language Models

Rakshanda Hassan Abhinandan, John Galeotti, Deva Ramanan, Gautam Rajendrakumar Gare

Where should the question go in a vision-language model (VLM) prompt: before the image or after it? Intuition says before: knowing what is asked should tell the model where to look. Yet across visual question answering benchmarks, question-first prompting consistently underperfor…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CV2026-07-17

When Can Test-Time Adaptation Help Zero-Shot CT Vision-Language Models?

Ailar Mahdizadeh, Puria Azadi Moghadam, Xiangteng He, Leonid Sigal

3D CT vision-language models (VLMs) classify abnormalities from text prompts in a zero-shot manner, enabling cross-institution deployment where labels are scarce and clinical tasks shift faster than supervised models can be retrained. A real CT scan, however, typically contains s…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.CLcs.CR2026-07-17

One Modality to Forget Them All: Enhancing Cross-Modal Unlearning in Vision-Language Models

Sudharshan Balaji, Yili Ren, Guangjing Wang, Yimin Chen, Ning Wang

Machine unlearning is widely used to remove hazardous knowledge from large language models. Modern Vision-Language Models (VLMs), however, process both text and visual inputs, raising a fundamental security question: does unlearning in one modality transfer to the other? We prese…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGeess.IV2026-07-21

Attributes Should Come from Images, Not Class Names: Distribution-Conditioned Attribute Selection for Vision-Language Models

Gautam Rajendrakumar Gare, Jia Shi, Zhiqiu Lin, Deepak Pathak, John Galeotti, Deva Ramanan

A popular route to interpretable zero-shot classification asks a large language model (LLM) to describe each class name and prompts CLIP with the resulting descriptors. We show that these descriptors carry little visual evidence of their own: removing the class name from the prom…

View free PDFSource page