CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CVcs.CLcs.CR2026-07-17

One Modality to Forget Them All: Enhancing Cross-Modal Unlearning in Vision-Language Models

Sudharshan Balaji, Yili Ren, Guangjing Wang, Yimin Chen, Ning Wang

Machine unlearning is widely used to remove hazardous knowledge from large language models. Modern Vision-Language Models (VLMs), however, process both text and visual inputs, raising a fundamental security question: does unlearning in one modality transfer to the other? We present the first systematic, bidirectional study of cross-modal unlearning transfer across three VLM architectures: LLaVA-1.5 (MLP projection), InstructBLIP (Q-Former), and IDEFICS (gated cross-attention). We find that unlearning transfers across modalities, but the transfer is asymmetric and incomplete. In some cases, text unlearning strongly transfers to vision. However, this robustness is not preserved under typographic attacks that manipulate the visual presentation of text. Under such attacks, previously unlearned knowledge can be readily recovered, indicating shallow unlearning. To address the transfer gap and shallow robustness, we propose \textsc{CrossInf}, an influence-guided mitigation strategy. Motivated by the observation that different model components contribute unequally to cross-modal transfer, \textsc{CrossInf} focuses unlearning on transformer blocks that most influence cross-modal generalization. It reduces the transfer gap by more than half in architectures with strong fusion, while preserving model utility. It also improves robustness under typographic attacks, reducing the attack success rate to near zero. We further conduct human evaluation with three annotators ($κ{=}0.77$) to validate our findings. Finally, we analyze shallow unlearning using Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA), providing insights into the observed transfer behavior and robustness limitations.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CVcs.CLcs.CR2026-07-18

Cross-Branch Conflict as a Shield: Safeguarding Facial Identities in Unified Multimodal Image Editing

Weiwei Tan, Junxian Li, Rui Wang, Zhenhua Xu, Yanjun Zhang, Yu Leo Zhang

Unified multimodal models (UMMs) have recently demonstrated powerful instruction-based image editing capabilities, but they also raise serious concerns about unauthorized manipulation of personal portraits. Existing adversarial protection methods are mainly designed for either vi…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.CLcs.LG2026-07-03

Pathways of Visual Information Flow in Vision-Language Models

Israfel Salazar, Stella Frank, Dan Oneata, Desmond Elliott, Constanza Fierro

We study how visual information is routed in vision-language models (VLMs). Using causal patching on controlled synthetic and natural datasets, we find that models rely on two distinct pathways to solve visual tasks: A direct pathway, where visual information is retained in image…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.IRcs.AIcs.CLcs.CV2026-07-06

Do All Visual Tokens Matter Equally? Object-Evidence Preserving Token Merging for Vision-Language Retrieval

Suhyeong Park, Junha Jung, Jungwoo Park, Jaewoo Kang

Multi-vector vision-language retrieval preserves fine-grained visual evidence through maximum-similarity late interaction, but dense image-side tokens make storage and scoring expensive. Existing token compression methods reduce this cost, yet they can remove or collapse object-…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-17

HCIG: A Hierarchical Cross-Modal Incongruity Graph Network for Multimodal Sarcasm and Cyberbullying Detection

Bhavana Verma, Priyanka Meel, Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma

Multimodal sarcasm and cyberbullying detection remain challenging because the intended meaning often emerges from incongruity between textual and visual information rather than from either modality alone. Existing multimodal approaches primarily rely on feature fusion or cross-mo…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.CL2026-07-06

Does It Fail to See or Fail to Know? Attributing Errors in Vision-Language Models

Khang Nhat Hoang Vo, Artem Vazhentsev, Artem Shelmanov, Timothy Baldwin, Yova Kementchedjhieva

Vision-language models (VLMs) perform well on visual question answering with high-quality images but struggle when questions require knowledge beyond what is clearly and directly visible. In such settings, uncertainty quantification should not only indicate whether the model is l…

View free PDFSource page