CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AI2026-07-08

CANN Bench: Benchmarking Agent Generated Kernels against Real NPU and Algorithmic Limits

Xue-Jian Gao, Deng Pan, Yueming Su, Jiasheng Li, Bin Du, Fengming Zhu, Chengdi Ma, Junyi Fan, Qichen Liao, Chengqiu Hu, Xinxian Chen, Lingchao Zheng, Jun Li, Jiwei Yang, Yuwei Fan

AI agents are now capable of writing, compiling, and iteratively optimizing low-level operator kernels on different hardware platforms. Existing benchmarks, however, focus almost exclusively on CUDA and Triton, leaving hardware ecosystems with less-exposed programming models without a common evaluation baseline. We present CANN Bench, an open benchmark for AI-generated operator code on Huawei's Ascend NPU. The current release covers 53 operators and 1060 test cases organized into four difficulty tiers -- from simple elementwise primitives to MoE dispatch and FlashAttention kernels -- spanning FP16, BF16, FP32, and INT8 precision formats. Evaluation adopts a \textbf{three-dimensional weighted composite score} that treats compilation, functional correctness, and performance as independent axes, providing a principled reward signal for kernel-generation agents. Performance is graded against an out-of-the-box PyTorch-on-Ascend baseline and an analytical per-case Hardware-Anchored Performance (HAP) limit on real NPU hardware, ensuring scores reflect genuine optimization headroom rather than measurement artifacts. The evaluation harness is designed to resist reward hacking from the ground up. CANN Bench is versioned within the official CANN repository and is designed for long-term community co-construction, providing the Ascend ecosystem with a quantitative, reproducible, and sustainably maintained yardstick for AI operator-authoring capability.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AI2026-07-12

Opti-Agent-Bench: Benchmarking End-to-End Optimization R&D Agents on Real-World Business Problems

Yongchang Fu, Xinjie Huang, Chengjun Dai, Chengzhe Feng, Junshao Zhang, Hong Zhu

LLM-based agents are increasingly deployed to solve optimization problems, yet existing benchmarks evaluate them on pre-structured mathematical formulations that bypass the most critical challenge: translating complex business requirements into correct models and solve efficientl…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-07-16

Are LLM-Generated GPU Kernels Production-Ready? A Trace-Driven Benchmark and Optimization Agent

Lingyun Yang, Yuxiao Wang, Shenghao Liang, Linfeng Yang, Daocheng Ying, Chunbo You, et al.

Existing GPU kernel generation benchmarks draw problems from synthetic or curated sources that diverge from deployed workloads. We present Atrex-Bench, a benchmark whose 30 operators and 440 shapes are sampled directly from full-cluster production inference traces of compute-limi…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-02

Hawk: Harnessing Hardware-Aware Knowledge for High-Performance NPU Kernel Generation

Junyi Wen, Ruiyan Zhuang, Yongjia Xu, Pengtu Li, Rui Zou, Hongyi Chen, et al.

Developing high-performance kernels for Neural Processing Units (NPUs) is a critical industry bottleneck, requiring developers to manually navigate implicit hardware constraints and strict memory hierarchies. While large language models offer immense automation potential, they fa…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-16

MCPEvol-Bench: Benchmarking LLM Agent Performance Across Dynamic Evolutions of MCP Servers

Huanxi Liu, Kun Hu, Jiaqi Liao, Qiang Wang, Pengfei Qian, YuanZhao Zhai, et al.

As Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers emerge as the core infrastructure for connecting LLMs with external tools, existing benchmarks leverage real-world MCP servers to evaluate LLM agents' tool-using capabilities. However, these benchmarks overlook the continuous evolution of t…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SDcs.AI2026-07-16

RW-Voice-EQ Bench: A Real World Benchmark for Evaluating Voice AI Systems

David Ayllon, Alice Baird, Jeffrey Brooks, Franc Camps-Febrer, Jakub Piotr Cłapa, Theo Lebryk, et al.

Current voice AI benchmarks typically evaluate isolated capabilities such as speech intelligibility, word error rate, or text-based dialogue quality, but they rarely test whether systems harness the acoustic information that distinguishes spoken language from its textual represen…

View free PDFSource page