CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-16

MCPEvol-Bench: Benchmarking LLM Agent Performance Across Dynamic Evolutions of MCP Servers

Huanxi Liu, Kun Hu, Jiaqi Liao, Qiang Wang, Pengfei Qian, YuanZhao Zhai, Dawei Feng, Bo Ding, Huaimin Wang

As Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers emerge as the core infrastructure for connecting LLMs with external tools, existing benchmarks leverage real-world MCP servers to evaluate LLM agents' tool-using capabilities. However, these benchmarks overlook the continuous evolution of tool interfaces and functionalities within MCP servers, resulting in flawed assessments that fail to capture the agent's adaptability in changing tool landscapes. To bridge this gap, we introduce \textbf{MCPEvol-Bench}, a novel benchmark for evaluating the task-solving capabilities of LLM agents under dynamic toolset evolution. Inspired by large-scale empirical study, we propose 11 mutation operators to simulate realistic tool evolution within 123 MCP servers. We benchmark 12 state-of-the-art LLMs on multiple versions of MCP servers, revealing that even frontier models struggle to adapt to evolving tools. For instance, GPT-5.4 and Claude-Sonnet-4-6 exhibit performance declines of 13.7\% and 14.4\% in evolved MCP servers, respectively, accompanied by substantial increases in planning and reasoning errors. These findings highlight the vulnerability of LLM-driven workflows, establishing MCPEvol-Bench as a standard for evaluating agent adaptability in dynamic tool environments.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-06-28

A Multi-Dataset Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Agents in Microservice Failure Diagnosis

Yuanhong Cai, Xiaohui Nie, Kanglin Yin, Changhua Pei, Yongqian Sun, Shenglin Zhang, et al.

LLM-based agents are reshaping microservice operations into AgentOps, where benchmarks are key to evaluating failure diagnosis over multimodal observability data. However, existing benchmarks remain largely outcome-oriented: they score only the final answer and fail to assess the…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-07-01

Are Performance-Optimization Benchmarks Reliably Measuring Coding Agents?

Zhi Chen, Zhensu Sun, Yuling Shi, David Lo, Lingxiao Jiang

Repository-level performance-optimization benchmarks such as GSO, SWE-Perf and SWE-fficiency evaluate coding agents by applying patches to real repositories and comparing runtime against unoptimized baselines and official reference patches. Their leaderboard scores are increasing…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.MA2026-07-16

StructureClaw: Traceable LLM Agents and an Executable Benchmark for Structural Engineering Workflows

Sizhong Qin, Yi Gu, Yao Jiang, Ao Cai, Changjian Zhou, Shaoxuan Shuai, et al.

Addressing a structural-engineering request requires more than a single answer; it requires a chain of interdependent artifacts: interpreted requirements, a computable model, validation records, solver outputs, code-check records, and a final report. Evaluations centered on quest…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-07-30

PAIChecker: Uncovering and Checking PR-Issue Misalignment in SWE-Bench-Like Benchmarks

Manyi Wang, Junjielong Xu, Pinjia He

SWE-bench-like benchmarks are widely used for evaluating LLM's issue resolution capability. They typically follow a common construction pipeline: each PR (Pull Request) is paired with its linked issue by extracting issue references from the PR description; the issue description i…

View free PDFSource page