CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LG2026-06-28

Dynamic Parsing and Updating Natural Language Specification using VLMs for Robust Vision-Language Tracking

Xiao Wang, Liye Jin, Dan Xu, Yuehang Li, Lan Chen, Yaowei Wang, Yonghong Tian, Jin Tang

Vision-language tracking guided by natural language specifications leverages high-level semantic cues of target objects to substantially boost tracking accuracy and robustness. Existing studies have verified that adaptively optimizing textual descriptions throughout the tracking process can effectively mitigate the semantic-visual mismatch induced by dynamic variations in target appearance, position, and other inherent attributes. Nevertheless, mainstream methods that directly generate textual information via sequence models or large language models inevitably suffer from inherent defects, including erroneous target updating, excessive background distraction, and pervasive hallucination artifacts. To address the aforementioned limitations, this paper proposes a novel language dependency parsing mechanism to precisely distill core tracking principal components, encompassing target objects, semantic concepts, and background contextual information. On this basis, we perform component-aware adaptive textual description updates by exploiting the powerful cross-modal understanding capability of the pre-trained vision-language model Qwen-VL. By integrating the proposed elaborately designed modules into the baseline framework, our method achieves consistent and superior tracking performance on multiple large-scale vision-language tracking benchmarks, including TNL2K, LaSOT, TNLLT, and OTB-LANG. The source code and pre-trained models will be released at https://github.com/Event-AHU/Open_VLTrack.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.MM2026-07-01

ESC: Emotional Self-Correction for Reliable Vision-Language Models

Tien-Huy Nguyen, Minh-Nhat Nguyen, Nguyen Nhat Huy, Hung Viet Nguyen, Huy Nguyen Minh Nhat, Thanh-Huy Nguyen, et al.

Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved strong performance across diverse multimodal tasks, yet they remain vulnerable to unreliable reasoning. Existing self-correction methods mitigate these issues but typically rely on post-training or carefully engineered feedback, incurri…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGeess.IV2026-07-17

Ask Twice, Look Twice: Prompt Echoing Resolves the Question-First Paradox in Vision-Language Models

Rakshanda Hassan Abhinandan, John Galeotti, Deva Ramanan, Gautam Rajendrakumar Gare

Where should the question go in a vision-language model (VLM) prompt: before the image or after it? Intuition says before: knowing what is asked should tell the model where to look. Yet across visual question answering benchmarks, question-first prompting consistently underperfor…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LG2026-06-29

Few-Shot Domain Incremental Learning via Continual Vision-Language Consolidation

Naeem Paeedeh, Mahardhika Pratama, Wolfgang Mayer, Mukesh Prasad, Weiping Ding, Yew-Soon Ong

Existing domain-incremental learning (DIL) strategies call for massive amounts of data to adapt to new domains and suffer from the overfitting problem in the case of data scarcity. This paper puts forward a relatively uncharted problem, namely, few-shot domain incremental learnin…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.RO2026-07-09

APIVOT: Adaptive Planning with Interleaved Vision-Language Thoughts

Emily Jin, Joy Hsu, Yiqing Xu, Weiyu Liu, Nick Haber, Jiajun Wu

Long-horizon robot planning requires jointly reasoning over semantic task structure and geometric feasibility. To successfully execute a task, a robot must decompose goals, select task-relevant objects, and sequence actions, while ensuring that plans satisfy spatial constraints s…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.RO2026-07-06

From Fixed to Free Cameras: Calibration-Free View-Robust Vision-Language-Action Model

Wenhao Li, Xueying Jiang, Quanhao Qian, Deli Zhao, Shijian Lu, Gongjie Zhang, et al.

Real-world robot deployment rarely maintains the training-stage camera setup, where cameras often experience repositioning or remounting depending on actual scenarios. Existing view-robust Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies tolerate such camera variations only when the camera…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGeess.IV2026-07-21

Attributes Should Come from Images, Not Class Names: Distribution-Conditioned Attribute Selection for Vision-Language Models

Gautam Rajendrakumar Gare, Jia Shi, Zhiqiu Lin, Deepak Pathak, John Galeotti, Deva Ramanan

A popular route to interpretable zero-shot classification asks a large language model (LLM) to describe each class name and prompts CLIP with the resulting descriptors. We show that these descriptors carry little visual evidence of their own: removing the class name from the prom…

View free PDFSource page