CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.CL2026-07-02

BOUNDARY_SYNC: Measuring Communication-Induced Representational Coupling in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

Zewen Liu

As large language models (LLMs) are deployed as communicating agents, does inter-agent communication cause outputs to converge? We introduce BOUNDARY_SYNC, a protocol measuring representational coupling via the Coupling Amplification Factor (CAF = JSD_cond / JSD_baseline), where CAF < 1 indicates homogenization and CAF > 1 indicates diversification. In controlled GPT-4o experiments (N=30, ~9,900 API calls), we measure coupling in text and image communication. Key findings: (1) text communication causes significant homogenization (CAF=0.803 [0.740, 0.873], d=1.30, p<0.001), confirmed by no-communication ablation and prompt-perturbation controls; (2) image communication also homogenizes under within-modality baselines (CAF=0.834 [0.811, 0.858]), with comparable proportional effect; (3) group size moderates coupling direction -- K=5 produces homogenization while K=3 yields CAF > 1.0 (point estimates 1.14 and 1.06, CI pending), suggesting a directional shift toward diversification; (4) cross-model replication shows extreme variation (CAF 0.034-0.803), with DeepSeek dominated by format artifacts; (5) coupling is stateless -- driven by prompt context rather than cumulative updating, with continuous consensus producing monotonic convergence. These results establish LLM agent coupling as real, measurable, and controllable at the prompt level, with direct implications for multi-agent system design.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.MAcs.CLcs.LGeess.SY2026-06-25

Delayed Verification Destabilizes Multi-Agent LLM Belief: Instability Thresholds and Optimal Corrector Placement

Igor Itkin

Multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems often rely on verifier and critic agents to suppress hallucinations, but verification is delayed. During this delay, false claims can propagate through the agent network. We model this process as delayed consensus on a graph with gro…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.MA2026-07-02

What LLM Agents Say When No One Is Watching: Social Structure and Latent Objective Emergence in Multi-Agent Debates

Arman Ghaffarizadeh, Danyal Mohaddes, Aliakbar Izadkhah, Shahriar Noroozizadeh

LLM agents will increasingly act in socially structured settings where role, audience, and relational context can shape what is advantageous or costly to say. We study whether such social structure, without any explicit objective in the prompt, changes what an agent expresses pub…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG2026-07-12

Route, Communicate, and Reason: Gated Routing and Adaptive Depth for Efficient Multi-Agent Reasoning

Sudipto Ghosh, Tanmoy Chakraborty

Multi-agent ensembling multiplies active parameters and inference cost without answering three basic questions: which agents to consult, how deeply a query should traverse a hierarchy of agents, and when inter-agent communication is worth its cost. We present GRADE (Gated Routing…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.MA2026-07-07

Norm Enforcement for AI Agents: Robustly Shaping Behavior in Multi-Agent Systems

Yaowen Ye, Jacob Steinhardt

AI agents are increasingly deployed in shared environments where they pursue diverse goals and compete for rewards. This multi-agent competition can lead to behaviors that serve individual gains at collective cost -- for instance, marketing agents may post misleading content as a…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.LGcs.MA2026-07-13

Fine-Tuned Multi-Agent Framework for Detecting OCEAN in Life Narratives

Rasiq Hussain, Darshil Italiya, Joshua Oltmanns, Mehak Gupta

Accurately assessing personality from text is challenging because traits are latent, context-dependent, and often subtly expressed across long narratives. Large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities by processing extensive textual contexts, but pretraining of these model…

View free PDFSource page