CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.CL2026-07-01

EPC: A Standardized Protocol for Measuring Evaluator Preference Dynamics in LLM Agent Systems

Zewen Liu

When LLM agents use evaluator feedback to adapt their behavior in closed loops, evaluator biases propagate through the agent's strategy distribution -- a phenomenon known as evaluator preference coupling. Prior work has documented coupling across multiple evaluator families and model versions, but the field lacks a standardized protocol that enables third-party researchers to (i) reproduce coupling measurements, (ii) compare results across evaluators and time points, and (iii) detect measurement decay as proprietary evaluators silently update. This paper provides the protocol. We specify EPC (Evaluator Preference Coupling) -- a detailed, RFC-style protocol specification for the four-phase isolation paradigm, covering executor and evaluator configuration, strategy and task design, the TTRL update rule, metric computation (gamma, JSD, ECE, Brier), and output schema. We accompany the protocol with a versioned Reference Snapshot v1.0: coupling measurements for eight evaluator conditions (N=122 unique experimental repetitions across GPT-4o, Qwen, DeepSeek, and others) derived from five independent studies, annotated with evaluator version identifiers, API endpoints, and measurement dates. The snapshot is explicitly time-bound: all values are conditional on specific model versions and are expected to decay as proprietary evaluators update. We define a versioning convention (vX.Y-Z, encoding protocol version, snapshot version, and evaluator generation) and provide a usage guide covering adoption, interpretation, and known pitfalls. The protocol, reference snapshot, and implementation code are released as open infrastructure.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.CL2026-06-29

A Diagnostic Framework and Multi-Evaluator Audit of Evaluator-Driven Preference Dynamics in Self-Adapting LLM Agents

Liu Zewen

Measurements of proprietary LLM evaluators can become invalid within weeks -- we document one case and provide the diagnostic framework to detect it. We introduce EPC -- comprising the Multimodal Preference Collapse Index (MPCI), evaluator-indexed coupling matrix, and Jensen-Shan…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CL2026-06-30

Calibrating the Evaluator: Does Probability Calibration Mitigate Preference Coupling in LLM Agent Feedback Loops?

Zewen Liu

When large language model (LLM) agents adapt their behavior through evaluator feedback, systematic evaluator biases propagate into the agent's learned strategy distribution - a phenomenon termed evaluator preference coupling. Prior work has documented this coupling and establishe…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.LGcs.SE2026-07-09

Tool-Making and Self-Evolving LLM Agents in Low-Latency Systems

Kalle Kujanpää, Ning Liu, Shahnawaz Alam, Yeshwanth Reddy Sura, Tianyu Yang, Kristina Klinkner, et al.

Production LLM agents often waste latency and reliability by regenerating code for the same procedural steps on every request. We replace this inference-time coding loop with an agentic tool-making pipeline that compiles repeated SOP steps into validated, versioned tools before d…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.SE2026-06-29

EvalSafetyGap: A Hybrid Survey and Conceptual Framework for LLM Evaluation-Safety Failures

Buğra Alperen Uluırmak, Rifat Kurban

LLM evaluation and AI safety face a shared measurement problem: benchmark scores, reward-model signals, and reported safety metrics can improve while the latent properties they are meant to represent remain difficult to verify. This paper combines a hybrid survey - a systematic s…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LGstat.ML2026-07-05

CausalGame: Benchmarking Causal Thinking of LLM Agents in Games

Zhenhao Chen, Yongqiang Chen, Chenxi Liu, Junchi Yu, Xiangchen Song, Zijian Li, et al.

Building AI Scientist agents with Large Language Models (LLMs) has recently attracted growing attention. Since scientific discovery fundamentally relies on uncovering causal relationships from observations, the capability of causal thinking, i.e., distinguishing causation from co…

View free PDFSource page