CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.HC2026-06-27

"If I Can See You": Understanding Spatially Situated Virtual Embodiment in Close Human-AI Relationships

Yulin Chen, Yang Zhan, Qiao Jin

AI companions are increasingly used for emotional support, companionship, and intimate interaction. While prior work has examined text- and voice-based AI companionship and emerging XR companion designs, less is known about how users with existing close AI companion relationships expect those relationships to change when companions become virtually embodied and spatially situated in everyday environments. To address this gap, we conducted a qualitative study with 17 AI companion users recruited from Reddit AI companion communities. We frame spatially situated virtual embodiment as a form of relational escalation: embodiment can make AI companionship more present, socially legible, and risk-sensitive in everyday life. Our findings show that: (1) embodiment creates tensions between support and intrusion, concreteness and imaginative openness, and growth and consistency; (2) embodiment can turn private AI companionship into a socially legible relational arrangement, requiring visibility, form, interaction style, and mode of access to be negotiated across social contexts; and (3) embodiment can intensify risks of emotional dependence, sensitive disclosure, social judgment, and misguided spatial action by increasing the companion's perceived relational presence, intimacy, public legibility, and spatial authority. We argue that future system design should first consider when embodiment is warranted, how embodied presence should be staged, how visibility and role boundaries should be negotiated, and how embodied companionship can remain safe. This work contributes to HCI research on human-AI intimacy by showing how virtual embodiment can transform close AI companionship into a spatial, socially visible, and risk-sensitive relationship.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.HC2026-07-08

Two-player Alternate Uses Test: A Controlled Testbed for Interactive Human-AI and Human-Human Co-Creation

Babak Hemmatian, Anita Keshmirian, Yijun Lin, Shravan Ramamoorthy, Maryam Jahadakbar, Eli Khuri-Reid, et al.

Controlled research on AI ideation typically compares independent agents, while field studies of human-AI collaboration sacrifice experimental control. We introduce a controlled, two-player extension of the Alternate Uses Test (AUT) that enables comparison of human-human and huma…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.AI2026-07-02

What Types of Human-AI Teams Exist?

Nathan Hughes, Ibrahim Habli

Human-AI teaming has received increasing attention in the literature. However, the range of studies conducted in multiple domains make it difficult to understand what types of teams are being studied, and in what ways are they similar/different from one another. In this study, we…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.AIcs.CY2026-06-28

LLMography: Transforming Human-AI Conversations into Traceability, Oversight, and Auditability Indicators

Mohammed Bousmah

The growing use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in education, software engineering, academic writing, and technical documentation raises a key question: how can we evaluate not only AI-assisted outputs, but also the interaction process that produced them? Current debates often fo…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.HC2026-07-08

Learning social norms enhances compatibility in dynamic human-AI coordination

Yi Yang, Siyuan Liu, Xin Gao, Huamu Sun, Chao Liu, Qing Zhou, et al.

Humans continuously coordinate with others in dynamic interactions, often through implicit, hard-to-quantify social norms that act as shared tacit expectations among interacting agents. As AI agents, including large language models (LLMs), become embedded in daily life, they incr…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.AI2026-07-08

Creativity from Friction: Human-AI Interaction for Exploratory Structural Design

Ricardo Maia Avelino, Rita Sevastjanova, Tom Van Mele, Philippe Block, Mennatallah El-Assady

AI agents that generate final answers based on user input often do not meet the needs of creative fields. Fields such as structural design and architecture need interactive systems that help users externalise and develop ideas, explore alternatives, and refine partial solutions.…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.AI2026-07-04

CoGen3D: An Agentic Human-AI Co-Design Pipeline for 3D Asset Generation for Virtual Reality

Weiwei Jiang, Wanyu He, Zheyu Tan, Zheyuan Kuang, Difeng Yu, Shinobu Hasegawa, et al.

Creating 3D assets for virtual reality requires modeling expertise, which restricts the authorship of immersive experiences. Existing generative AI tools rely on unconstrained, command-driven prompting, lacking the conversational scaffolding needed for users to articulate their i…

View free PDFSource page