CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CV2026-06-30

PixelEyes: Decoupling Perception and Reasoning for Pinpoint Visual Evidence Seeking

Dengxian Gong, Yuanzheng Wu, Haobo Yuan, Zhengdong Hu, Tao Zhang, Yikang Zhou, Shihao Chen, Quanzhu Niu, Kai Wang, Jason Li, Haochen Wang, Lu Qi, Shunping Ji, Ming-Hsuan Yang

This paper explores multi-turn visual reasoning and observes that MLLMs repeatedly fail to localize the target, leading to long, redundant trajectories. We attribute this failure to the entanglement of reasoning and perception within a single model, the MLLM reasons and localizes simultaneously, and inaccurate localization triggers additional reasoning turns that bloat the trajectory. To solve this problem, we propose PixelEyes, a multi-turn visual reasoning agent that explicitly decouples reasoning from perception, i.e., the reasoner decides what to look for, while a specialized perception tool answers where it is. Specifically, PixelEyes introduces 1) Mask-guided Visual Search. A referring segmentation model is invoked to provide mask-precise localization, freeing the reasoner from the need to compensate for imprecise grounding. 2) Semantic-region Breadth-first Search (BFS). To eliminate redundant loops caused by repeatedly cropping incorrect sub-regions, we organize exploration as a breadth-first search over semantic regions. To internalize these capabilities, we construct the PixelEyes-6K dataset by resynthesizing expert trajectories from existing data. This explicitly embeds our mask-guided search and BFS logic into the model. We further introduce Pinpoint-Bench, a zero-hint visual search benchmark, i.e., no location cues are provided in the question, with instance-level masks and bounding boxes that separate localization failures from reasoning failures, enabling fine-grained analysis of failure modes such as inattentional blindness. Recent state-of-the-art MLLMs and visual reasoning agents leave large headroom on Pinpoint-Bench, demonstrating its quality and difficulty. Code and models are open-sourced.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CV2026-07-01

Perceive-to-Reason: Decoupling Perception and Reasoning for Fine-Grained Visual Reasoning

Hongxing Li, Xiufeng Huang, Dingming Li, Wenjing Jiang, Zixuan Wang, Haolei Xu, et al.

Fine-grained visual reasoning remains challenging for vision-language models, especially when small but critical visual cues are buried in high-resolution images. Existing approaches rely on repeated cropping or test-time visual search to introduce local evidence, but they typica…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIeess.IV2026-07-14

IQA-T1: Tool-based Visual Evidence Reasoning for Image Quality Assessment

Jinjian Wu, Jiaqi Tang, Wei Wei, Yingying Yan, Jianmin Chen, Botong Geng, et al.

Image Quality Assessment (IQA) in open-world environments remains challenging due to limited generalization and interpretability. Recent approaches based on multimodal large language models (MLLMs) introduce textual reasoning for quality prediction, yet their judgments rely heavi…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CV2026-07-10

Model Guides You How to Draw: Adaptive Visual Gating for Unified Multimodal Reasoning

Wenxi Gao, Guanxi Lu, Didi Zhu, Hao Mark Chen, Quan Deng, Zhican Wang, et al.

Unified multimodal models (UMMs) with interleaved reasoning, which generate both textual and visual steps as part of intermediate reasoning traces, have demonstrated great potential for visual mathematical reasoning tasks. However, we identify a key insight in this paradigm: gene…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AI2026-07-20

Sparse Evidence Can Suffice: Agentic Evidence Seeking for Multimodal Video Misinformation Detection

Haochen Zhao, Yongxiu Xu, Xinkui Lin, Dong Xie, Jiarui Lu, Yuqi Qian, et al.

Multimodal video misinformation detection is commonly formulated as a holistic video-understanding task, where the entire video and its associated content are processed and judged in a single pass. However, real-world misinformation often exhibits a sparse and compositional evide…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CV2026-07-07

Bridging Physical Reasoning and Task Generalization via Visual Action Outcome Reasoning Alignment

Han-Jun Ko, Jr-Jen Chen, Haobo Yuan, Hsin-Ying Lee, Tiancheng Shen, Ming-Hsuan Yang, et al.

Vision-language models (VLMs) struggle to generalize in interactive physical reasoning, particularly under unseen tasks and environments. Two key failure modes are prominent: hallucinated chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning that contradicts physical reality, and misalignment between…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CV2026-07-14

UniVR: Thinking in Visual Space for Unified Visual Reasoning

Zhongwei Ren, Yunchao Wei, Yao Zhao, Weibo Gong, Xiao Liu, Anran Wang, et al.

Learning broad world knowledge directly from raw visual data is a fundamental capability of intelligence. We introduce UniVR, the first investigation into simultaneously learning complex reasoning, fine-grained physical dynamics, and long-term planning from pure visual demonstrat…

View free PDFSource page