CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.PL2026-07-14

Theory-Level Autoformalization: From Isolated Statements to Unified Formal Knowledge Bases

Marcus J. Min, Mike He, Zhaoyu Li, Zixuan Yi, Sharad Malik, Aarti Gupta, Xujie Si, Osbert Bastani

Autoformalization translates informal natural language into formal, machine-verifiable languages. While most work focuses on individual statements, real formalization efforts are inherently theory-level: they require an entire web of axioms, definitions, and lemmas before target theorems can even be stated. In this position paper, we argue for theory-level autoformalization: formalizing complete theories, including all their inter-dependencies, as structured libraries. We examine the significance of this shift, address alternative views, identify open challenges, and propose three promising paths forward. Our survey of autoformalization is available at https://github.com/marcusm117/Awesome-Autoformalization.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-03

KARMA: Knowledge graph-based Automated Reasoning Materialization and Alignment

Jinkyeong Choi, Chaebin Jeong, Donghyeon Park

Template-based contrastive synthesis is scalable, but its candidates often differ only in a few entity-slots while sequence-level optimization spreads supervision over mostly shared templates. We formalize this as the Resolution Mismatch Problem and propose KARMA, which enumerate…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.MA2026-07-21

Knowledge-Centric Self-Improvement

Xuefei Julie Wang, Lauren Hyoseo Yoon, Chengrui Qu, Amanda Zichang Wang, Atharva Sehgal, Eric Mazumdar, et al.

Self-improving AI systems typically treat the agent as the object that improves, by optimizing prompts, workflows, harnesses, or even the agent's own code. This agent-centric view can make improvements expensive to maintain and difficult to transfer, because gains become tied to…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-08

Co-LMLM: Continuous-Query Limited Memory Language Models

Yair Feldman, Linxi Zhao, Nathan Godey, Dongyoung Go, Yilun Hua, Kilian Q. Weinberger, et al.

Limited memory language models (LMLMs) externalize factual knowledge during pretraining to a knowledge base (KB), rather than memorizing it in their weights. During generation, the model then fetches knowledge from the KB as needed. This recently introduced paradigm provides mult…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CLcs.DB2026-07-22

Auto-Fill: Learning to Predict Missing Values Accurately with Specialist Language Models

Yurong Liu, Yeye He, Haoyu Dong, Junjie Xing, Shi Han, Dongmei Zhang, et al.

Predicting missing cell values in tabular data is a fundamental problem in data cleaning. While state-of-the-art reasoning models show great promise in predicting missing values in tables, by reasoning holistically across rows and columns, they are costly to deploy at scale and t…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-31

CalibratedRubric: Task-Adaptive Rubric Banks for Open-Ended LLM Evaluation

Mengting Chen, Yanshu Sun, Wanting Liang, Beidi Luan, Rui Sun, Dezhi Chen, et al.

Reliable evaluation of open-ended LLM outputs requires fine-grained rubrics, yet expert curation is costly and difficult to scale. Existing automated pipelines rely on strict judge unanimity and binary variance filters, which cannot distinguish measurable rubrics from informative…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.HCcs.IRcs.LG2026-06-26

DysLexLens: A Low-Resource LLM Framework for Analysing Dyslexic Learners Insights from Online Forums

Dana Rezazadegan, Atie Kia, Phongpadid Nandavong, Dominique Carlon, Jeremy Nguyen, Abhik Banerjee, et al.

Dyslexic learners increasingly use artificial intelligence (AI) tools to support reading, writing, organisation, and study-related tasks. However, their lived experiences with these tools remain largely underexamined. This paper proposes DysLexLens, a low-resource LLM framework,…

View free PDFSource page