CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CVcs.AI2026-07-03

R3D: Quantitative 3D Spatial Reasoning for Egocentric Wearables

Maxwell Horton, Wei Lu, Quan Tran, Yury Astashonok, Kirmani Ahmed, Babak Damavandi, Anuj Kumar, Xiao Zhang, Seungwhan Moon

Quantitative 3D spatial reasoning from egocentric RGB-D video is a critical capability for next-generation wearable assistants. Yet existing benchmarks do not reflect the challenges of handling (1) natural egocentric video, (2) posed RGB-D video inputs, and (3) challenging quantitative 3D spatial reasoning Q&A. To fill this gap, we introduce R3D-Bench (Reasoning in 3D), a benchmark of 3,033 quantitative spatial reasoning questions across 15 types -- spanning multiple-choice, distance-based, and volumetric reasoning questions -- built on top of 57 egocentric video sequences from Aria Digital Twin. To set a strong baseline on this dataset, we introduce R3D, a model-agnostic spatial tool-calling framework. In contrast to existing approaches that directly embed 3D information into the model's input representation, R3D constructs a 3D scene from video using segmentation and depth-lifted object representations. It provides this information to an LLM through eight composable spatial tools. On R3D-Bench, R3D with Qwen3-VL 235B achieves 73.5% mean relative accuracy, substantially outperforming the best depth-enabled baseline (CuTR+Tools, 61.9%) and the best RGB-only baseline (Gemini 3 Flash, 46.5%).

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CVcs.AI2026-07-07

SpaR3D-MoE: Adaptive 3D Spatial Reasoning from Sparse Views Meets Geometry-Inductive Mixture-of-Experts

Haida Feng, Hao Wei, Haolin Wang, Shiwei Li, Chade Li, Yihong Wu

Recent Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) struggle to bridge the representational gap between 2D semantic understanding and 3D spatial geometry. Existing 3D-aware models either rely on costly 3D-specific data or utilize RGB-only inputs with heuristic sampling and monolithic…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AI2026-07-15

GeoAnchor: Collaborative Reasoning via Latent Decomposition for 3D Spatial Understanding

Hao Li, Han Fang, Zixin Pan, Xin Wei, Hongbo Sun, Jinglin Xu, et al.

Although multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress, understanding 3D spatial relationships from 2D images remains a critical challenge. Existing methods primarily rely on symbolic text tokens, which inherently lack the fidelity to represent contin…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CVcs.MM2026-07-20

OrientSAM: Mitigating Camera-Centric Shortcut in Multimodal Spatial Reasoning via Orientation-Aware Spatial Alignment

Wenxiao Fan, Hang Yin, Kan Li

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) still struggle with spatial reasoning that requires perspective transformation. In particular, they often rely on camera-centric cues rather than reasoning from the reference object's viewpoint, leading to systematic errors in non-camera r…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.MM2026-06-28

ScAle: Attention Head Scaling as a Minimal Adapter for Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Models

Rahul Chowdhury, Timothy A Rupprecht, Xuan Shen, Pu Zhao, Yanzhi Wang

Spatial reasoning remains a persistent challenge for many vision language models (VLMs), and improving it typically requires fine-tuning with substantial additional parameters. Our preliminary analysis reveals that rescaling activations in selected transformer layers-without modi…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-23

3D-Aware VLMs with Implicit and Explicit Geometries

Wenhao Li, Xueying Jiang, Quanhao Qian, Deli Zhao, Ran Xu, Shijian Lu, et al.

Despite rapid progress, most existing vision-language models (VLMs) built from 2D visual inputs often struggle when handling various 3D tasks that require fine-grained spatial understanding and reasoning. To bridge this gap, we present VLM-IE3D, a unified framework that enhances…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-01

MindEdit-Bench: Benchmarking Object-Level Counterfactual Spatial Reasoning in VLMs from In-the-Wild Photos

Leyuan Yu, Xiao Tang, Minghao Liu, Xinyuan Li, Xiaokai Bai, Sheng Zhou, et al.

Benchmarks for vision-language models (VLMs) mostly test observational spatial reasoning: models describe relations already visible in the input. Existing what-if tasks typically vary the observer while keeping the scene fixed. Can VLMs instead predict the consequences of hypothe…

View free PDFSource page