CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-06

Context-Masked Truncated Reasoning Audits for Answer-Key Dependence in LLM Tutors

Bonan Shen, Dingyan Shang, Youting Wang, Tao Ning, Bowen Liu

Large language model (LLM) tutors may have access to teacher notes, answer keys, rubrics, or retrieved solutions while producing student-facing explanations. We study whether truncated reasoning probes can distinguish direct access to such private context from answer information carried by the written explanation. Using Truncated Reasoning AUC Evaluation (TRACE), we evaluate 1000 GSM8K problems under question-only, correct answer-key, and wrong answer-key contexts. When forced-answer probes retain the private key, answer-key TRACE AUC rises from 0.375 to 0.900, and the gold answer is recoverable with no explanation at all in 998 of 1000 cases. We then introduce a context-masked replay: answer-key-generated prefixes are probed under the corresponding question-only prompt. Masking reduces 10\% prefix accuracy from 0.997 to 0.126 and median AUC from 0.900 to 0.375, nearly matching question-only values of 0.113 and 0.375. On 746 pairs where both explanations end correctly, the masked mean AUC difference is $-0.0086$ with a 95\% bootstrap interval spanning zero. Wrong keys still account for 272 of 387 incorrect final responses, showing that private artifacts can influence outputs even when early-prefix evidence disappears after masking. These results establish context masking as necessary for attributing early answer availability to an explanation rather than its hidden input.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-22

Reference-Free Evaluation of Reasoning in Open-Ended Question Answering

Guneet Singh Kohli, Yuxiang Zhou, Michael Sejr Schlichtkrull, Gregory E Dean, Maria Liakata

AI-generated answers in high-stakes domains are often fluent but difficult to verify, especially when they contain multi-step reasoning rather than a single final answer. We propose a reasoning-based, reference-free framework for auditing LLM-generated outputs. The method decompo…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.CYcs.LG2026-06-26

Cognitive Episodes in LLM Reasoning Traces Enable Interpretable Human Item Difficulty Prediction

Chenguang Wang, Ming Li, Xinyue Zeng, Zhuochun Li, Hong Jiao, Tianyi Zhou, et al.

Predicting human item difficulty is central to educational assessment, where reliable estimates support fairness and effective test construction. Existing methods often depend on costly human calibration or item-level textual representations, providing limited evidence about the…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG2026-07-16

Stop Thinking, Start Looking: Efficient Post-Training for Multimodal Document Question Answering via Reasoning-Free Alignment

Harikrishnan P M, Goutham Vignesh, Ganesh Parab, Saisubramaniam Gopalakrishnan, Vishal Vaddina, Varun V, et al.

Efficient multimodal document question answering with explicit visual grounding, locating the precise document region that supports each answer remains an open challenge. Current approaches bifurcate into Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), which requires large annotated datasets and r…

View free PDFSource page