CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivquant-phcs.LG2026-07-20

Quantum Reservoir Computing: Recent Advances and Future Directions

Shehbaz Tariq, Muhammad Talha, Arshid Ali, Muhammad Diyan, Symeon Chatzinotas

Quantum reservoir computing (QRC) uses the dynamics of a fixed or weakly tuned quantum system to transform temporal and sequential inputs into measured features, while training is typically confined to a classical readout. This separation reduces reliance on repeated quantum parameter updates and avoids the barren plateaus associated with variational circuit training. Its computational power is often attributed to the exponentially large Hilbert space of the quantum system. However, the memory, nonlinearity, and expressivity that determine what a reservoir can actually compute depend jointly on the input encoding, quantum evolution, observables, measurement, and readout, not on Hilbert space dimension alone. On hardware, these capabilities are further constrained by finite sampling, hardware noise, measurement backaction, and the cost of estimating observables, so a large state space alone does not guarantee useful computation. In this survey, we develop a common system model that connects these components and use it to organize QRC foundations, computational properties, reservoir architectures, operating protocols, and physical implementations. We examine spin, photonic, superconducting, bosonic, neutral atom, and other analog platforms, together with applications, software and high performance computing support, benchmarking, and reproducibility. The analysis distinguishes hardware demonstrations from simulations and identifies the assumptions and resources that govern comparisons across implementations. Current results do not establish a broad quantum advantage over well matched classical reservoirs. We therefore specify the resource accounting, benchmark standards, and theoretical criteria needed to evaluate claims of quantum advantage.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivquant-phcs.LG2026-07-10

When Classical Baselines Are Tuned as Carefully as the Quantum Model, Does Quantum Reservoir Computing Still Win?

Tushar Pandey

Can a small quantum computer forecast a changing signal better than an ordinary classical method? Many studies say yes, but the classical methods they compare against are often left in a basic, untuned state while the quantum model is carefully optimised. We ask what happens when…

View free PDFSource page
arxivquant-phcs.LGq-fin.CPq-fin.ST2026-07-09

A Novel Hybrid Quantum Reservoir Computing (nHQRC) for Phase Transition Detection in Non-Equilibrium Dynamical Systems

Manoj B. Bhatkar, Prashant M. Yawalkar

The analysis of highly non-linear stochastic data within non-equilibrium dynamical systems requires computational frameworks capable of detecting latent phase transitions before systemic structural breakdowns occur. Traditional Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQAs) are frequently…

View free PDFSource page
arxivquant-phcs.LG2026-07-08

A Quantum Reservoir Architecture for Chaotic Forecasting and a Test of Whether Its High Dimension Helps

Tushar Pandey

Quantum reservoir computing uses a fixed quantum circuit as a feature generator and trains only a simple linear readout on top of it. This makes it cheap to train and free of the optimisation problems that affect many quantum machine-learning models. A natural worry is that the v…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.LGquant-ph2026-07-07

Onnes: A Physics-Grounded Multi-Agent LLM Simulator for Cryogenic Fault Diagnosis in Quantum Computing Infrastructure

Praneeth Narisetty, Uday Kumar Reddy Kattamanchi, Shiva Nagendra Babu Kore

Dilution refrigerators are the enabling infrastructure of superconducting quantum computers, yet their fault diagnosis is still dominated by threshold alarms that report that something is wrong, not what. We present Onnes, a physics-grounded digital-twin simulator of a dilution r…

View free PDFSource page
arxivquant-phcs.LG2026-07-01

Bridging Quantum Computing Paradigms toward Semiconductor Yield: A Controlled CV-versus-DV Comparison on Wafer-Map Defect Classification

Yeonhong Kim, Jonghyeok Im, Monu Nath Baitha, Kyoungsik Kim

Realizing quantum neural networks (QNNs) in industry requires knowing which quantum computing paradigm suits which task. Motivated by AI accelerators and high-bandwidth memory, where die stacking makes wafer-level defect screening central to yield, we study WM-811K wafer-map defe…

View free PDFSource page
arxivquant-phcs.AIcs.LG2026-06-25

Efficient foundation decoders for fault-tolerant quantum computing

Ge Yan, Shanchuan Li, Shiyi Xiao, Pengyue Ma, Hanyan Cao, Feng Pan, et al.

Foundation decoders, a class of high-capacity neural decoders, are leading candidates for fault-tolerant quantum computing, with accurate and efficient decoding at large code distances. However, their construction often faces a steep scaling barrier, as larger code distances rapi…

View free PDFSource page