CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.HC2026-07-12

U-Lens: Supporting User Uncertainty Management in Long-Form LLM Responses

Yu Mei, Qingyue Zhuang, Jie Cai, Chang Liu, Zhi Zheng, Zhoutong Ye, Chun Yu, Yuanchun Shi

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate long-form answers for knowledge-intensive tasks, but users often struggle to decide which parts of a response deserve scrutiny, why they may be unreliable, and what to do next. Prior work on uncertainty communication has largely focused on making uncertainty visible through cues such as confidence scores, leaving less support for the broader process of managing uncertainty distributed across a long response. Through a formative study, we examine how users manage such uncertainty across three stages: interpretation, evaluation, and decision. Based on these insights, we derive design guidelines that address both stage-specific and cross-stage needs: uncertainty target representation, evaluative explanation, response guidance, and interactive presentation. We instantiate these guidelines in U-Lens, an uncertainty-management support system that organizes uncertain information in long-form responses into contextual inspection targets, prioritizes them for attention, and connects each target with evaluative context and response options. We evaluated U-Lens in a controlled within-subjects study with 18 participants, comparing it against a confidence-cue baseline. Our results show that U-Lens improved verification efficiency and effort allocation, lowered perceived workload, and strengthened perceived support across interpretation, evaluation, and decision stages. This work reframes uncertainty support for generative AI from presenting isolated, text-centered cues toward supporting the user-centered process of interpreting, evaluating, and acting on uncertain information.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.HC2026-07-23

Exploring the Design Space of LLM-Based Programming Support in CS Education: A Scoping Review through the Lens of Assistance Governance

Minsun Kim, S. Moonwara A. Monisha, Zihan Wu, David H. Smith

As large language models (LLMs) become integrated into programming education, learner-facing systems increasingly differ in how that assistance is bounded, enacted, and controlled. These governance decisions are often described implicitly, making it difficult to compare systems i…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HC2026-07-10

When LLM Tutoring Responses Work: Evidence from Student Programming Conversations

Mohammad Fahim Abrar, Shayla Sharmin, Roghayeh Leila Barmaki

As students increasingly use LLM tutors in computer science education, one question becomes especially important: what kind of response helps a student continue productively? Prior work has studied how students use LLMs in computer science education, but less is known about how t…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.AI2026-07-24

Beyond Perspectives: A Trio-Ethnography of Interpretation Evolution in LLM-Supported Programming Education

Jennie Ren, Jordan H. McDowell, Kyrie Zhixuan Zhou

Generative AI is reshaping programming education, yet educators often infer students' AI-supported learning from classroom observations alone. This experience report presents a trio-ethnography involving two computing educators with different teaching philosophies and one undergr…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HC2026-06-29

Drawing Out Legal Risks: Co-Designing with Lawyers to Predict and Manage Legal Uncertainties of Medical AI Tools

Gennie Mansi, Julia Kim, Michael Rosenbloom, Mark Riedl

While there's optimism around medical AI tools due to their abilities to adapt from user-to-user and across environments, these new abilities complicate how people and organizations are able to predict and manage risk based on existing laws and regulations. Lawyers are trained to…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HC2026-07-02

When Do LLM Personas Support Visualization Design? A Cross-Model Study of Color Assignment and Chart Choice

Shahreen Salim, Klaus Mueller

Large language model personas are increasingly used to approximate diverse users during early-stage visualization design, but it remains unclear whether persona-conditioned outputs reflect stable personality effects or artifacts of model choice and task framing. We examine this q…

View free PDFSource page