CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-23

Mean-to-Score Discrete Diffusion: Posterior-Mean Denoisers for Score Entropy

Jingyuan Li, Xiaoyi Jiang, Yixuan Jiang, Wei Liu, Yi Zhu, Zuoqiang Shi, Pipi Hu

Score Entropy Discrete Diffusion (SEDD) parameterizes discrete reverse processes with unconstrained positive score ratios. While positivity guarantees nonnegative reverse jump rates, it does not ensure Bayes realizability: ratios at a noisy state need not be jointly induced by any clean-token posterior under the forward kernel. The score-entropy loss has the correct population optimum but does not enforce this constraint away from it. In a trained pure-uniform SEDD checkpoint, roughly one quarter of complete score vectors violate the coordinate box, while more than half lie inside it yet remain materially incompatible with any valid posterior. Such violations can produce negative pre-normalization weights in finite-step sampling. Projecting raw scores onto the bridge polytope removes all observed negative weights and improves external generative PPL from $203.6$ to $175.1$ without changing the sampler. We introduce \emph{mean-to-score} (M2S), which predicts a clean-token posterior mean and converts it to the score through an exact kernel-dependent linear map. The construction applies to any known coordinate-wise continuous-time Markov chain (CTMC) satisfying a mild support condition. For uniform corruption, it maps the probability simplex onto the bridge polytope; for absorbing-mask corruption, the resulting objective recovers MD4 exactly. In a controlled 28.4M-parameter CIFAR-10 comparison, M2S lowers test BPD from $3.173$ to $3.129$ and FID-50k from $\CifarSEDDFID$ to $\CifarMtwoSFID$. A 170M-parameter M2S model trained on about 262B OpenWebText token slots outperforms the evaluated pure-uniform SEDD, GIDD, and Neural CTMC checkpoints at every tested sampling budget, reaching generative PPL $143.3$ at 128 steps versus $183.6$ for the strongest pure-uniform baseline.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CLcs.ITstat.ML2026-07-06

What Does a Discrete Diffusion Model Learn?

Rodrigo Casado Noguerales, Bernhard Schölkopf, Thomas Hofmann, Aran Raoufi

What does a discrete diffusion model learn: a denoiser, a score ratio, or a bridge plug-in predictor? At the level of jump rates, these are one object in different coordinates, and reading a neural network in the wrong coordinate changes the process being trained and sampled. Sta…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-15

Discrete Diffusion Models: A Unified Framework from Tokenization to Generation

Ye Yuan, Weien Li, Rui Song, Zeyu Li, Haochen Liu, Xiangyu Kong, et al.

Discrete denoising diffusion models (DDMs) have recently emerged as a compelling alternative to autoregressive (AR) modeling for discrete data, offering parallel generation and iterative global refinement capabilities. Unlike continuous diffusion, where the state space is fixed,…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-01

Discrete Diffusion Language Models for Interactive Radiology Report Drafting

Max Van Puyvelde, Halil Ibrahim Gulluk, Wim Van Criekinge, Olivier Gevaert

Diffusion language models, which generate text by denoising a token canvas bidirectionally instead of emitting tokens left to right, have become competitive with autoregressive (AR) generation. Medical foundation models, however, remain almost entirely autoregressive. We adapt a…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-07

Graph Convolutional Attention: A Spectral Perspective on Graph Denoising and Diffusion

Shervin Khalafi, Igor Krawczuk, Sergio Rozada, Charilaos Kanatsoulis, Antonio G Marques, Alejandro Ribeiro

Denoising graphs is a fundamental problem in graph learning and the core operation of graph diffusion models. Attention-based architectures like graph transformers have recently shown promise in denoising graphs. However, our principled understanding of attention-based graph deno…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-14

CoDiffGRN: Rethinking Gene Regulatory Network Inference via the BEELINE-KGC Benchmark and Co-evolutionary Discrete Diffusion

Jiaze Song, Runhao Zhao, Minghao Xu, Bin Cui, Wentao Zhang

Inferring gene regulatory networks (GRNs) from single-cell transcriptomic data is crucial for biological discovery, yet existing approaches suffer from a fundamental misalignment with real-world needs. Researchers typically seek a small set of high-confidence regulatory interacti…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CVeess.SP2026-07-13

DiffEEG: A Self-Supervised Denoising Diffusion Model for Learning EEG Generic Representations

Abdulkader Helwan, Lina Abou-Abbas, Hussein El Amouri, Belkacem Chikhaoui, Khadidja Henni

Deep learning for EEG-based seizure detection faces critical challenges: severe annotation scarcity and extreme class imbalance, where ictal events comprise less than 10\% of clinical recordings. We present DiffEEG, a 9.6M-parameter self-supervised foundation model that addresses…

View free PDFSource page