CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AI2026-07-06

MetaSkill-Evolve: Recursive Self-Improvement of LLM Agents via Two-Timescale Meta-Skill Evolution

Zefeng Wang, Minxi Yan, Jinhe Bi, Sikuan Yan, Volker Tresp, Yunpu Ma

Recent LLM agents tackle increasingly long-horizon, open-ended tasks, and external skills, reusable procedural knowledge supplied to the agent, further extend this capability. However, a fixed, hand-authored skill is rarely optimal, and cannot adapt to the diversity of tasks an agent encounters. Self-improving agents address this by rewriting their own skill files from execution traces, yielding meaningful gains on challenging benchmarks. Yet such self-evolution remains non-recursive: it improves only the task skill (what the agent does) while the improvement procedure (how it improves) is authored once and held fixed. We introduce MetaSkill-Evolve, a two-timescale framework that makes agentic skill improvement recursive: every branch carries both a task skill $s$ and a branch-local meta-skill $m=(ψ,σ,α,π,\varepsilon)$ whose five components parameterise the Analyzer, Retriever, Allocator, Proposer, and Evolver agents of the improvement pipeline. Task skills evolve on a fast loop while the meta-skill evolves on a slower one under the same pipeline applied to itself, with no additional model or objective. With all five pipeline agents sharing a single frozen backbone, MetaSkill-Evolve outperforms no-skill, static-skill, and single-level evolution baselines on three agentic benchmarks (OfficeQA, SealQA, ALFWorld), improving held-out test accuracy over the raw backbone by +23.54, +16.09, and +1.92 points respectively.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.MA2026-07-14

Who Grades the Grader? Co-Evolving Evaluation Metrics and Skills for Self-Improving LLM Agents

Xing Zhang, Guanghui Wang, Yanwei Cui, Ziyuan Li, Wei Qiu, Bing Zhu, et al.

Self-evolving agent systems improve by creating, revising, and retiring their own skills, but every such loop rests on a hidden assumption: a reliable evaluation metric already exists. In many real applications it does not. We make three claims. First, metrics can be \emph{evolve…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-07-23

AREX: Towards a Recursively Self-Improving Agent for Deep Research

Shuqi Lu, Chaofan Li, Kun Luo, Zhang Zhang, Hui Wang, Hongwang Xiao, et al.

Deep research requires agents to find answers that jointly satisfy multiple constraints. Discovering such answers is costly, whereas verifying a candidate can often be decomposed into tractable constraint-wise checks. This discovery--verification asymmetry suggests that a researc…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.MA2026-07-21

Knowledge-Centric Self-Improvement

Xuefei Julie Wang, Lauren Hyoseo Yoon, Chengrui Qu, Amanda Zichang Wang, Atharva Sehgal, Eric Mazumdar, et al.

Self-improving AI systems typically treat the agent as the object that improves, by optimizing prompts, workflows, harnesses, or even the agent's own code. This agent-centric view can make improvements expensive to maintain and difficult to transfer, because gains become tied to…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG2026-07-14

Self-Improvements in Modern Agentic Systems: A Survey

Zhe Ren, Yimeng Chen, Dandan Guo, Guowei Rong, Tonghui Li, R. B. Xiong, et al.

Self-improving autonomous agents are moving from research prototypes to deployed systems. The primary goal is controllable evolution, or adaptation, from experience with minimal or even no human input. This survey frames modern self-improving agents as adaptive systems that conve…

View free PDFSource page