CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivq-bio.NCcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-01

NeuroCogMap Reveals Cognitive Organization of Large Language Models

Zhongxiang Sun, Haolang Lu, Qiang Ma, Qi Li, Qipeng Wang, Liang Pang, Chenyu Liu, Qiankun Li, Hao Sun, Kun Wang, Yi Zeng, Jun Xu, Guoqi Li, Ji-Rong Wen

Understanding how complex cognitive functions are organized within artificial systems is central to interpreting large language models (LLMs) and relating them to biological cognition. Yet although LLMs exhibit broad cognitive-like behaviours, it remains unclear whether their internal representations form reproducible functional systems that explain behaviour, failure and links to human cognition. Here we present NeuroCogMap, a cognitive neuroscience-inspired framework that organizes internal features of LLMs into functional parcels and links them to interpretable functions, cognitive capabilities and a cognitive hierarchy. These parcels form a stable and semantically coherent organization that is partly conserved across models and functionally linked to model outputs. Within this organization, major LLM failures, including hallucination, bias, refusal failure and sycophancy, correspond to distinct disruptions in representational and behavioural-control systems, yielding internal signatures for mechanism-guided detection and targeted intervention. Beyond model behaviour, NeuroCogMap improves prediction of human cortical responses during naturalistic language comprehension, with the strongest correspondence in higher-order association cortex. At the cognitive level, its internal signatures expose latent strategies that guide refinements of classical models of human decision-making. Together, these findings establish NeuroCogMap as a system-level framework for mapping functional organization in artificial systems and for relating this organization to human cortical function and cognitive behaviour.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.SIphysics.soc-ph2026-07-13

Reproducing human biases in route choice using large language models: Toward scalable behavioral modeling

Jiangtao Han, Shoufeng Ma, Shuxian Xu, Geng Li, Shuai Ling, Ning Jia, et al.

Human choice behavior, including route choice, exhibits systematic behavioral biases that deviate from the assumptions of full rationality. Cumulative prospect theory (CPT) has been widely recognized as an effective framework for characterizing such behavioral patterns. However,…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-19

Debate-on-Graph: Reliable and Adaptive Reasoning of Large Language Model on Uncertain Knowledge Graph

Peiji Yu, Xin Chen, Tianxing Wu

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language processing. However, LLMs often suffer from hallucinations and lack of relevant knowledge when dealing with question answering (QA) tasks. To mitigate these issues, knowledge graphs (KGs) h…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.HC2026-07-16

Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Scientific Visualization Literacy

Patrick Phuoc Do, Chau M. Ta, Chaoli Wang

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly used to interpret visualizations, yet current evaluations remain largely chart-centric and provide limited evidence of understanding of scientific visualization (SciVis). We benchmark six MLLMs on the scientific visualizat…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-13

Comparing Semantic Navigation in Humans and Large Language Models using Natural Language Processing

Gabriel Paris-Colombo, Rodrigo M. Cabral-Carvalho, Felipe D. Toro-Hernández

Semantic memory retrieval can be conceptualized as navigation through conceptual space. We compared semantic search dynamics between humans and three large language models (GPT-4o, Gemini-2.5-Pro, Claude-Sonnet-4.5) using verbal fluency data. By applying trajectory-based NLP metr…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-11

SPARK: Susceptibility-Guided Profiling and Steering of Latent Reasoning States in Large Language Models

Dongxu Zhang, Yiding Sun, Zihao Guo, Xiangyang Yang, Kai Tang, Lin Chen, et al.

Reasoning failures in large language models (LLMs) are usually evaluated from final answers, but a wrong answer does not reveal why the model failed. The same incorrect output may reflect missing capability, an unstable reasoning trajectory, or a failure to activate a reasoning s…

View free PDFSource page