CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LG2026-07-21

Adjustment Speed as a Safety Constraint for Nonstationary Reinforcement Learning

Timothy Tomashevskiy

Ensuring safety in reinforcement learning under nonstationarity requires determining whether a learning system can safely adapt to forecasted environmental change within the required recovery horizon. Existing safe reinforcement learning methods typically assume stationary environments and do not explicitly consider adaptation speed as a safety concern. However, when environments evolve over time, delayed adaptation may result in transient unsafe behavior. This paper proposes adjustment speed as a safety constraint for nonstationary reinforcement learning. The central idea is to define safety in terms of adaptation feasibility: future states or regions may become unsafe when the adaptation required to remain safe exceeds the learning system's calibrated recovery capacity. The proposed framework uses learned context representations and short-horizon context forecasts to estimate adaptation demand and compare it with the agent's achievable adaptation capacity. When predicted adaptation demand exceeds the calibrated recovery capacity, the framework proactively tightens the admissible action set and activates an action-level shield to reduce unsafe behavior before violations occur. Experiments in a nonstationary driving environment show that the proposed approach primarily reduces safety violations in short-horizon windows aligned with context changes. Ablation studies further show that shielding is more conservative for peak- and tail-risk suppression, while optimization-level adjustment provides additional reductions in short-horizon switch-conditioned violations. These results support adaptation feasibility as a practical safety principle for reinforcement learning under nonstationarity and demonstrate that proactive intervention can improve safety during periods of environmental change.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-23

TOUR: A Trajectory-Level Unlearning Benchmark for Offline Reinforcement Learning

Chaofan Pan, Lingfei Ren, Xiangyu Jiang, Yanhua Li, Xuemei Cao, Xiangkun Wang, et al.

Offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents are trained on fixed behavioral trajectories, which makes trajectory-level deletion important when selected data must be removed after training. Evaluating such deletion is difficult because a lower membership score can reflect trajector…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LG2026-07-31

Sample Efficient Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning via Best Policy Identification

Anders Jonsson, Emilie Kaufmann, Gianmarco Tedeschi, Lorenzo Steccanella

We present HBPI-UCRL, a model-based algorithm for hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) that learns high-level and low-level policies in parallel. HBPI-UCRL exploits the fact that a high-level transition corresponds to a multi-step transition at the low level. We introduce tw…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-24

Teaching LLMs to Self-Evolve: Cultivating Core Meta-Skills with Reinforcement Learning

Shujin Wu, Cheng Qian, Xiusi Chen, Heng Ji

Test-time scaling through iterative self-evolution with environment feedback, as demonstrated by AlphaEvolve, shows remarkable performance gains. We hypothesize that the success of such evolution frameworks hinges on meta-skills, such as self-reflection with environment feedback,…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LG2026-07-24

Integrated Order Dispatching and Routing for Last-Mile Pickup via Deep Reinforcement Learning

Yida Xu, Zhaofang Mao, Yuheng Miao, Jiaxin Zhang, Yiting Sun

In recent years, the growing complexity of last-mile pickup operations has increased the need for fast and accurate decision-making on logistics platforms. This challenge is fundamentally driven by two key and tightly coupled decision-making processes: order dispatching and routi…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-23

Relative Value Learning

Marc Höftmann, Jan Robine, Stefan Harmeling

In reinforcement learning, critics typically estimate absolute state values $V(s)$, estimating how good a particular situation is in isolation. However, it turns out that only differences in value are relevant for control. Motivated by this, we propose Relative Value Learning (RV…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.MAcs.RO2026-07-23

Compact Latent Coordination for Autonomous Vehicles at Unsignalized Intersections

Gil Lifshits, Igal Bilik, Gilad Katz

Coordinating autonomous vehicles at unsignalized intersections remains a critical challenge for multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) systems, which typically struggle with combinatorial action spaces, reliance on privileged information, or rigid agent designs. We propose Mas…

View free PDFSource page