CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.ROcs.LG2026-07-07

A Risk-Field Enhanced Closed-Loop Digital Twin Framework for Autonomous Driving Safety Validation

Yongzhi Liu

Autonomous driving systems require reliable safety validation before real-world deployment. However, large-scale road testing is costly, difffcult to reproduce, and inefffcient for exposing rare safety-critical scenarios. Conventional simulation improves repeatability, but an offfine simulator alone cannot continuously connect physical trafffc states, virtual reconstruction, algorithm evaluation, and scenario evolution. This paper proposes a risk-ffeld enhanced closed-loop digital twin framework for autonomous driving safety validation. The framework integrates physical data acquisition, data synchronization, virtual twin reconstruction, risk-aware scenario generation, autonomous driving algorithm evaluation, and safety analysis. A driving risk ffeld is introduced as a uniffed intermediate representation to describe obstacle, lane-departure, road-boundary, time-to-collision, and comfort-related risks around the ego vehicle. The risk ffeld ranks high-risk scenarios in the digital twin scenario library and provides dense safety guidance for reinforcement learning-based driving policies. A simulation-style evaluation protocol is designed to compare conventional reinforcement learning baselines, risk-penalty baselines, and the proposed risk-ffeld guided method. The study indicates that embedding explicit risk structure into digital twins can make autonomous driving validation more targeted, interpretable, and reusable, while its practical effectiveness remains bounded by model ffdelity, risk calibration, and sim-to-real transfer.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.CVcs.LG2026-07-12

Action Map Policy: Learning 3D Closed-loop Manipulation via Pixel Classification

Haojie Huang, Zhang Ye, Linfeng Zhao, Boce Hu, Mingxi Jia, Yu Qi, et al.

The action space poses a major challenge in robot learning, since it is often high-dimensional, can span long time horizons, and frequently admits multi-modal optimal solutions. A good choice of action representation and loss function can help to address these concerns, but there…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.CVcs.LG2026-06-29

Learning from Mistakes: Rollout-Retrieval Lifelong Policy Learning for Autonomous Driving

Cheng Gong, Haoyang Wang, Chao Lu, Zirui Li, Jianwei Gong

Autonomous driving policies should be able to improve continually as deployment exposes them to increasingly diverse and long-tail traffic situations. However, most learning-based policies are trained or fine-tuned on expert demonstrations and then rely largely on generalization…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-08

Shift & Drift: A Zero-Shot Benchmark for Generalizable and Robust Autonomous Driving Motion Planning

Alessandro Canevaro, Hang Yu, Julian Schmidt, Peizheng Li, Silvan Lindner, Wilhelm Stork, et al.

While closed-loop motion planners trained on large-scale, object-level datasets, e.g., nuPlan, demonstrate strong in-distribution (ID) performance, their generalization to novel urban topologies and recovery mechanisms following execution perturbations remain under-explored. To a…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.LG2026-06-30

What Probing Reveals about Autonomous Driving: Linking Internal Prediction Errors to Ego Planning

Hyeonchang Jeon, Kyungbeom Kim, Eugene Vinitsky, Kyung-Joong Kim

Large-scale datasets and fast simulators have enabled improvements in driving policies that appear safe and robust, yet strong performance in nominal scenarios can still mask flawed reasoning and unsafe heuristics. Summary scores from closed-loop simulators do not give significan…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.RO2026-07-18

What Do They See? Interpreting Complex Road Scenarios Through the Eyes of Vision-Language-Action Models for Safe and Trustworthy Autonomous Vehicle Learning

Kalpana Panda, Wesley Maia, Vinti Agarwal, Ross Greer

End-to-end autonomous driving models are now able to navigate complex road scenarios, mapping raw sensor observations directly to observed paths for open-loop evaluation and often effective driving in closed-loop evaluation. Yet the internal logic of these safety-critical systems…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.LGcs.SE2026-07-08

Validate the Dream Before You Trust Its Verdict: Admissibility for World-Model Simulators

Christian Oefinger, Finn Rasmus Schäfer, Korbinian Moller, Mattia Piccinini, Johannes Betz

Across robotics, World Models (WMs) are increasingly used to evaluate action policies by simulating the consequences of actions in an imagined world, and returning a success or safety verdict. Yet a verdict is only as trustworthy as the WM that produced it, and the WM itself need…

View free PDFSource page