CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LG2026-07-05

RL Forgets! Towards Continual Policy Optimization

Mao-Lin Luo, Zhe-Xu Wang, Zi-Hao Zhou, Bo Ye, Jian Zhao, Min-Ling Zhang, Tong Wei

Continual post-training is becoming a central paradigm for adapting vision-language models to evolving tasks. Recent work has increasingly favored reinforcement learning over supervised fine-tuning, driven by the belief that reinforcement learning is inherently less prone to forgetting. However, the belief remains insufficiently validated, as existing evidence is largely drawn from outdated or homogeneous benchmarks. We revisit this assumption under recent and diverse multimodal reasoning tasks. To this end, we introduce MRCL, a Multimodal Reasoning Continual Learning benchmark. Experiments on MRCL show that standard reinforcement learning still suffers from severe catastrophic forgetting during continual post-training. We trace this failure to an objective mismatch: the KL regularization used in common policy optimization methods is evaluated on current-task data, whereas forgetting is caused by behavioral drift on prior-task distributions. To address this problem, we propose Continual Policy Optimization (CPO), a replay-free framework grounded in a prior-task behavioral KL objective. CPO relaxes the intractable historical KL constraint into sparse parameter-movement regularization, limiting policy drift without storing old data. Extensive experiments across multiple model scales show that CPO consistently reduces forgetting while preserving, and in some cases improving, pretrained model capabilities. On Qwen3-VL-8B, CPO reduces forgetting by 13.7% and improves pretrained capability by 7.0%. The implementation code is available at https://github.com/MaolinLuo/CPO.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-08

ORCAID: Oblique Rule-Based Continuous-Action Interpretation for Deep RL Policies

Ignacio D. Lopez-Miguel, Ezio Bartocci, Thomas Eiter, Martin Tappler

Explainability remains a key issue in reinforcement learning (RL). Distilling an interpretable policy from an agent trained in a complex environment is particularly challenging when the action space is continuous. We introduce ORCAID, a novel method for extracting interpretable r…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-11

Beyond Euclidean Clipping: Overcoming Exploration Collapse in LLM RL via Riemannian Isometric Policy Optimization

Zhicheng Cai, Xinyuan Guo, Hanlin Wu, Mingxuan Wang, Wei-Ying Ma, Ya-Qin Zhang, et al.

Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a dominant paradigm for enhancing LLMs' reasoning capabilities. However, RL algorithms with PPO-Clip are inherently limited by exploration collapse. Subsequent works remain primarily heuristic and fail to identify the essential cause of PPO-…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LG2026-06-28

The Mirage of Optimizing Training Policies: Monotonic Inference Policies as the Real Objective for LLM Reinforcement Learning

Jing Liang, Hongyao Tang, Yi Ma, Yancheng He, Weixun Wang, Xiaoyang Li, et al.

Reinforcement learning (RL) has gained growing attention in large language model (LLM) post-training, yet RL training remains fragile and can suffer from instability or collapse. One vital cause is training-inference mismatch: LLM adopts separate inference and training engines fo…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-11

ARMOR: Stabilizing On-Policy LLM RL with Off-Policy Anchor Samples

Kexin Huang, Junkang Wu, Jinda Lu, Shuo Yang, Chiyu Ma, Jiancan Wu, et al.

Reinforcement learning (RL) has significantly enhanced the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), yet the training process remains notoriously fragile. In this work, we investigate a critical source of this instability: over-optimization, where models exploit tra…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LG2026-06-29

Experience Augmented Policy Optimization for LLM Reasoning

Jinda Lu, Kexin Huang, Junkang Wu, Shuo Yang, Jinghan Li, Chiyu Ma, et al.

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is a powerful paradigm for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). However, existing RLVR methods typically rely on on-policy optimization from scratch, resulting in high sampling costs and ineffi…

View free PDFSource page