CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-16

OmniaBench: Benchmarking General AI Agents Across Diverse Scenarios

Chengyu Shen, Yujie Fu, Gangtao Xin, Yanheng Hou, Wenlong Fei, Guojie Zhu, Jiawei Li, Hongcheng Gao, Runming He, Zhen Hao Wong, Meiyi Qiang, Hao Liang, Zhao Cao, Hao Jiang, Chong Chen, Wentao Zhang

Large language models are increasingly evolving from text generators into general agents capable of understanding user requests, invoking external tools, and completing complex tasks through interaction. However, existing agent benchmarks often focus on limited scenarios, tool ecosystems, or interaction formats, making it difficult to systematically characterize model capabilities across heterogeneous application settings. We introduce OmniaBench, a benchmark for evaluating general agents across diverse scenarios with explicit state spaces. We derive application-oriented scenario knowledge from app stores, product documents, industry resources, Web retrieval, and human refinement, forming a hierarchical taxonomy that spans ToC, ToB and ToE with 90 level-1 and 354 level-2 domains. Based on this taxonomy, we construct executable environments and synthesize single-turn and multi-turn tasks through four complementary routes: DAG, DAG-S, Solver, and Program. OmniaBench further introduces a ten-dimensional capability taxonomy and eight compositional atomic difficulty factors to support fine-grained evaluation and analysis. The resulting dataset contains 1,431 tasks, together with a challenging subset of 644 tasks designed to reduce evaluation cost and mitigate potential contamination of the full set after public release. The bench presents substantial challenges to current frontier models, with even Claude-Sonnet-5 and GPT-5.6-Sol achieving Overall Pass@1 scores of only 58.54 and 57.14, respectively. Further analyses reveal clear differences across domains and capabilities, as well as persistent limitations in planning, constraint maintenance, and adaptive correction. OmniaBench provides a broad and diagnostic benchmark for characterizing the capability boundaries of general agents.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.CV2026-06-30

HealthAgentBench: A Unified Benchmark Suite of Realistic Agentic Healthcare Environments for Challenging Frontier AI Agents

Qianchu Liu, Sheng Zhang, Guanghui Qin, Jeya Maria Jose Valanarasu, Maximilian Rokuss, Mingyu Lu, et al.

As AI agents become increasingly capable of complex, long-horizon reasoning, rigorous and holistic evaluation is essential for measuring progress toward real-world healthcare applications. We introduce HealthAgentBench, a suite of 54 agentic healthcare tasks across 7 categories e…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.MA2026-07-10

AppWorld-UL: Benchmarking Diverse Agent-User Interactions for Tool-Use

Junzhi Chen, Harsh Trivedi, Jane Pan, Michael JQ Zhang, Tejas Srinivasan, Niranjan Balasubramanian, et al.

Tool-use agents that address day-to-day digital tasks such as ordering groceries must not only operate applications, but also interact with the user, e.g., to ask clarification questions, prompt for confirmation, and inform the user when the instruction is infeasible. However, cu…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.DBcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG2026-07-02

AgenticDataBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Data Agents

Zhaoyan Sun, Shan Zhong, Daizhou Wen, Jiaxing Han, Guoliang Li, Ying Yan, et al.

Data science aims to derive actionable insights from heterogeneous raw data, unlocking the value of the massive amounts of data generated in modern society. Automating this process is essential to reducing labor-intensive efforts for data scientists and enabling scalable data-dri…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.MA2026-07-07

Norm Enforcement for AI Agents: Robustly Shaping Behavior in Multi-Agent Systems

Yaowen Ye, Jacob Steinhardt

AI agents are increasingly deployed in shared environments where they pursue diverse goals and compete for rewards. This multi-agent competition can lead to behaviors that serve individual gains at collective cost -- for instance, marketing agents may post misleading content as a…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-02

PACE: A Proxy for Agentic Capability Evaluation

Yueqi Song, Lintang Sutawika, Jiarui Liu, Lindia Tjuatja, Jiayi Geng, Yunze Xiao, et al.

Evaluating LLM agents on benchmarks like SWE-Bench and GAIA can be expensive, time-consuming, and requires complex infrastructure. A single evaluation can cost thousands of dollars and take days to complete. In contrast, non-agentic LLM benchmarks that test individual capabilitie…

View free PDFSource page