CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CLcs.LG2026-06-29

REAR: Test-time Preference Realignment through Reward Decomposition

Fuxiang Zhang, Pengcheng Wang, Chenran Li, Yi-Chen Li, Yuxin Chen, Lang Feng, Chenfeng Xu, Masayoshi Tomizuka, Bo An

Aligning large language models (LLMs) with diverse user preferences is a critical yet challenging task. While post-training methods can adapt models to specific needs, they often require costly data curation and additional training. Test-time scaling (TTS) presents an efficient, training-free alternative, but its application has been largely limited to verifiable domains like mathematics and coding, where response correctness is easily judged. To extend TTS to preference alignment, we introduce a novel framework that models the task as a realignment problem, since the base model often fails to sufficiently align with the stated preference. Our key insight is to decompose the underlying reward function into two components: one related to the question and the other to preference information. This allows us to derive a REAlignment Reward (REAR) that selectively rescales the proportions of these two reward terms. We then show that REAR can be formulated as a linear combination of token-level policy log-probabilities, making it computationally efficient and easy to integrate with various TTS algorithms such as best-of-$N$ sampling and tree search. Experiments show that compared to other test-time baselines, REAR not only enables scalable test-time realignment for preference alignment tasks under diverse user requirements, but also generalizes to mathematical and visual tasks under appropriate preference settings.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CLstat.ML2026-06-27

When More Sampling Hurts: The Modal Ceiling and Correlation Ceiling of Test-Time Scaling

Yong Yi Bay, Kathleen A. Yearick

People overthink; language models over-sample, and the extra effort can talk both into a worse answer. Reasoning systems answer a hard question by sampling it many times (test-time scaling), and the more they draw, the more often a correct answer turns up somewhere, so coverage,…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.CL2026-07-01

QuasiMoTTo: Quasi-Monte Carlo Test-Time Scaling

Michael Y. Li, Anthony Zhan, Kanishk Gandhi, Noah D. Goodman, Emily B. Fox

Scaling inference compute, by generating many parallel attempts per problem, is a costly but reliable lever for improving language model capabilities. By default these attempts are generated independently, wasting inference compute on redundant solutions. This waste seems unavoid…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-02

Safe Inference-Time Alignment via Lagrangian Reward Augmentation

Yaswanth Chittepu, Ativ Joshi, Sohini Chintala, Scott Niekum

Inference-time alignment steers a frozen language model during decoding using auxiliary reward signals, avoiding the cost of repeated weight updates. However, existing inference-time alignment methods typically optimize a single scalar score, so explicit safety constraints must e…

View free PDFSource page