CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.HC2026-07-22

A Task Taxonomy for Edge and Trail Bundling

Markus Wallinger, Stephen G. Kobourov

Edge bundling reduces visual clutter by aggregating similar edges, yet practitioners lack a structured vocabulary for reasoning about the tasks that bundled visualizations support. Such a vocabulary is needed both to evaluate the general utility of bundling and to compare different bundling approaches. We address this gap by assembling a corpus of 102 papers, 49 of which contain explicit bundling tasks, spanning node-link diagrams, geographic trail sets, and parallel coordinate plots. From this corpus, we derive a task taxonomy organized as a matrix of scope (Element, Bundle, Global, Multi-view) crossed with action (Verify, Identify, Characterize, Quantify, Compare, Assess), instantiated across the three representation types. We show that bundling simultaneously enables tasks (bundle-level and global reasoning) and disables others (element-level precision), a duality not captured by existing task frameworks. Our coded corpus and taxonomy are released as supplemental material on OSF (osf.io/23r67).

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.HC2026-07-10

Indirect and Direct AI Scaffolding for Computational Problem Posing: A Pilot Experience Report

Shayla Sharmin, Mohammad Fahim Abrar, Mohammad Al-Ratrout, Roghayeh Leila Barmaki

Problem posing is a valuable learning activity in computing education, encouraging learners to actively construct, refine, and reflect on problems rather than simply solving them. This experience report presents the design and pilot deployment of two LLM-powered scaffolding syste…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.HCcs.IR2026-07-13

PaperRouter-Agent: A Content-Grounded LLM Agent for Personalized Hierarchical Paper Routing

Keshen Zhou, Lintao Wang, Suqin Yuan, Zhuqiang Lu, Yu Luo, Zhiyong Wang

Researchers organize the papers they collect into personal folder hierarchies in reference managers, and route each new paper into the folder where it belongs. This task differs from standard hierarchical text classification. A user's folder hierarchy is not a fixed, shared taxon…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.CYcs.HC2026-07-06

Rating the Pitch, Not the Product: User Evaluations of LLMs Reflect Expectations More Than Performance

Robert Morabito, Tyler McDonald, Charitra Viswanath, Angel Hsing-Chi Hwang, Susanne Gaube, Jad Kabbara, et al.

Imagine two users interact with the same LLM. One has been told it is the cutting-edge flagship model; the other, an older, weaker model. They walk away with markedly different ratings of its usefulness and intelligence, yet they used the same model. In a controlled study, 162 pa…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.CV2026-07-16

Skeleton: Visual Authoring of Non-visual Data Experiences

Frank Elavsky, Chieri Nnadozie, Lucas Nadolskis, Patrick Carrington, Dominik Moritz

When sighted practitioners author accessible data visualizations, they build navigation structures (the nodes, edges, and input bindings that govern how assistive technologies traverse an interface) entirely in code, with no visual representation. Without a representation to reac…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HC2026-07-31

Data Visualization Style Guides in Practice: Why They Emerge, How They Work, and When They Bend

Alvitta Ottley, Jonathan Schwabish

Visualization style guides play a crucial role in shaping how data is interpreted and trusted, yet they often receive little scrutiny in their creation and use. Understanding their impact requires looking beyond the specific rules that style guides prescribe and examining how the…

View free PDFSource page