CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.HC2026-06-30

DigitalCoach: Communication and Grounding Gaps in Human and Agentic Computer Use Coaching

Meng Chen, Anya Ji, Tsung-Han Wu, Tobias Maringgele, David M. Chan, Alane Suhr, Amy Pavel

Agents are increasingly capable of automating software tasks, but can they teach humans how to use software themselves? We introduce DigitalCoach, a multimodal dataset of 72 human expert-novice computer use coaching sessions consisting of 22,752 dialogue turns grounded in 28.1 hours of screen and input event recordings across five software applications. We use DigitalCoach to evaluate whether state-of-the-art models can teach humans how to use computers. Automated evaluation shows that models differ from humans in how they coach: models provide more direct instructions, but fewer explanations, error diagnoses, and knowledge-check questions. When we fix the coaching method, models produce utterances similar to human references yet poorly grounded in visual context. Interactive evaluation confirms that model coaches cause learners to passively follow instructions without deeper engagement and fall short in visual grounding. DigitalCoach lays a foundation for collaborative and proactive computer use coaching agents.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.HCcs.LG2026-07-10

A small language model detects behavioural faithfulness gaps that frontier judges and human raters miss

Kwan Soo Shin, In Seok Kang, Yunkyung Min, Munho Lee

Whether a language model behaves as it claims is a judgement on which independent human raters cannot agree (Fleiss kappa = 0.074). We show that a small, purpose-built instrument does better. A linear read-out of the frozen representation of a from-scratch 146-million-parameter a…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.DLcs.HC2026-07-18

Real-World Evaluation of an AI Agent Drafting Translational Impact Summaries

Mohammad Arvan, Amber E. Osterholt, Bailee Rue, Yuvaneswaren R. Sureshbabu, Krishna R. Patel, Rebecca T. Feinstein, et al.

Introduction. Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) programs must document their scholars' research impact, but assembling each scholar's record by hand takes staff an estimated 15 hours and does not scale to a full cohort. An artificial intelligence (AI) agent could se…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.HC2026-07-03

OpenGlass: A Sensing-Computing Split Architecture for Local MLLM-Driven Real-Time Visual Assistance

Mengzhang Li, Yuan Yao

We present OpenGlass, an open-source, privacy-oriented, local-first system for low-latency multimodal visual assistance, with a primary focus on blind and low-vision users. Cloud MLLM assistants offer strong visual understanding, but often require uploading first-person visual da…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.HCcs.IRcs.LG2026-06-26

DysLexLens: A Low-Resource LLM Framework for Analysing Dyslexic Learners Insights from Online Forums

Dana Rezazadegan, Atie Kia, Phongpadid Nandavong, Dominique Carlon, Jeremy Nguyen, Abhik Banerjee, et al.

Dyslexic learners increasingly use artificial intelligence (AI) tools to support reading, writing, organisation, and study-related tasks. However, their lived experiences with these tools remain largely underexamined. This paper proposes DysLexLens, a low-resource LLM framework,…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.HC2026-07-16

Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Scientific Visualization Literacy

Patrick Phuoc Do, Chau M. Ta, Chaoli Wang

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly used to interpret visualizations, yet current evaluations remain largely chart-centric and provide limited evidence of understanding of scientific visualization (SciVis). We benchmark six MLLMs on the scientific visualizat…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.HC2026-07-17

On the Structure of Address in Multi-Party Dialogue: From Discrete Labels to Continuous Levels

Taiga Mori, Koji Inoue, Divesh Lala, Tatsuya Kawahara

In multi-party dialogues between a dialogue system and multiple users, identifying to whom an utterance is addressed is a key challenge. Prior work has typically treated addressee detection as a multi-class classification task, selecting a single label representing an individual…

View free PDFSource page