CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CRcs.AI2026-07-07

PRoVeFL: Private Robust and Verifiable Aggregation in Federated Learning

Harsh Kasyap, Anil Kumar Pradhan, Ugur Ilker Atmaca, Graham Cormode, Carsten Maple

Federated Learning (FL) enables multiple clients to collaboratively train machine learning models while retaining data locality, thereby enhancing user privacy. However, traditional FL frameworks rely on a centralized aggregation server and assume honest-but-curious clients, making them susceptible to both server-side inference and client-side poisoning attacks. Although recent work has explored secure and Byzantine-resilient FL protocols, they face a fundamental trade-off among privacy, integrity, and verifiability, and incur substantial computational and communication overhead due to the heavy use of cryptographic primitives. In this work, we propose PRoVeFL-a novel, modular FL framework that is Privacy-preserving, Byzantine-Robust, and ensures Verifiable aggregation. PRoVeFL employs multiple servers leveraging multi-key fully homomorphic encryption. Each client encrypts its local model updates and distributes encrypted shares to all servers. This design enables a hybrid computation model in which ciphertext operations are carefully offloaded to the plaintext domain under strict privacy constraints to efficiently evaluate complex statistical aggregation rules. PRoVeFL is compatible with a wide range of state-of-the-art Byzantine-robust aggregation algorithms (e.g., Krum, Trimmed Mean, FLTrust, norm clipping, MESAS, and more) and further enhances them with verifiability mechanisms that require minimal trust in at least one honest server. We evaluate it across different settings and demonstrate its scalability with varying numbers of parameters and participants. PRoVeFL improves runtime over the prior works, Prio and ELSA, based on distributed trust with comparable security guarantees, up to 100x and 10x, respectively.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CR2026-07-08

FedCVESA: Taking Away Training Data in Federated Learning via Correlation Value Encoding and Segmented Aggregation

Chongkai Li, Bang Zhang, Wenjian Luo

Federated learning (FL) avoids explicit data exposure by keeping raw data on local clients, yet privacy risks remain in the training process and the learned model itself. Recently, centralized Taking Away Training Data (TATD) attacks have shown that malicious training could abuse…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CRcs.CY2026-07-07

Recovering Clinical Utility Under Differential Privacy: Empirical Validation of Adaptive Federated Aggregation on Heterogeneous Cardiovascular Datasets

Rodrigo Tertulino, Laercio Alencar, Ricardo Almeida

Validating federated learning frameworks on real clinical data is an essential step between proof-of-concept demonstrations in controlled synthetic environments and deployment in real multicenter healthcare settings. A prior architectural study by the same authors (Tertulino and…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-16

FLINT: Fingerprinting Federated Learning Architectures from 5G PHY-Layer Side Channels

Md Nahid Hasan Shuvo, Mahmudul Hassan Ashik, Moinul Hossain

Federated Learning (FL) over 5G cellular networks protects raw data but remains vulnerable to side-channel leakage. Prior fingerprinting attacks assume packet-level network visibility, an assumption that does not hold at the 5G Physical (PHY) layer, where user payloads are encryp…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-01

Generative AI and Federated Learning for Intrusion Detection Systems: A Survey

Jiefei Liu, Abu Saleh Md Tayeen, Pratyay Kumar, Qixu Gong, Wenbin Jiang, Huiping Cao, et al.

Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs) are essential for monitoring network traffic and identifying malicious activities in modern cyber-physical, Internet of Things (IoT), enterprise, and distributed network environments. However, developing reliable IDS models remains challenging b…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CR2026-07-08

Where to Intervene? Benchmarking Fairness-Aware Learning on Differentially Private Synthetic Tabular Data

Vinícius Gabriel Angelozzi, Héber H. Arcolezi

Machine learning models are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, raising concerns about both privacy and fairness. Differential Privacy (DP) has become a gold standard for privacy-preserving data analysis, while fairness-aware mechanisms aim to mitigate discrimination ag…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CRcs.CY2026-07-18

Privacy Cost as Equity Input: A Group Fairness Criterion for Differentially Private Machine Learning

Rakshit Naidu

Differential privacy (DP) is increasingly deployed to limit membership inference risk in machine-learning systems. Prior work has shown that DP-SGD can widen accuracy disparities across demographic groups, but this framing treats fairness as a purely outcome-side concern. We argu…

View free PDFSource page