CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGmath.NAmath.OCstat.ML2026-06-28

Optimizer Memory Makes Shuffle Order a First-Order Source of Fine-Tuning Noise

John Sweeney

Shuffle order can be a larger source of fine-tuning noise than a memoryless analysis predicts: fixed-clock optimizer memory makes local equal-multiset contrasts first order in the learning rate rather than second order, and the resulting order channel can be large enough for a single seed to flip a close A/B comparison. We isolate this mechanism and derive a fit-free way to size the noise it produces. For a memoryless optimizer, reordering an equal multiset has no first-order endpoint term; the leading local contrast is the $O(η^2)$ gradient bracket. Fixed-clock optimizers such as AdamW are different. Their moment buffers, preconditioner state, and de-biasing counters advance with the step index rather than with the learning-rate-scaled time $τ=ηk$, so the same gradient can receive a position-dependent endpoint weight. For any fixed finite measurement window, a lifted-state expansion gives an $O(η)$ equal-multiset contrast whenever the first-order replay coefficient is nonzero, while regular and clock-matched controls remain $O(η^2)$; a bare fixed-$β$ momentum buffer is already enough. A bitwise-deterministic replay from one warmed optimizer state isolates the mechanism, giving order-variance slopes 1.83 for AdamW, 2.00 for fixed-$β$ momentum, and 4.00 for SGD; matching the memory clock to $τ$ restores the regular exponent. For AdamW with a frozen preconditioner, the same impulse-weight kernel gives a closed-form asymptotic order-variance floor after the local potentials are measured, with no fitted coefficients. The result is local to the measurement window (independent reshuffling can average the channel across windows), but it yields order-noise error bars, positional attribution weights, and a seed-budget criterion for fine-tuning comparisons.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivstat.MLcs.LGmath.NAstat.CO2026-07-24

Convergence analysis of a family of Zermelo-type iterations for the Bradley--Terry model

Ruijian Han, Ding Lu, Yiming Xu

Zermelo's algorithm is a classical method for computing the maximum likelihood estimator in the Bradley--Terry (BT) model, but its convergence can be slow in practice. To accelerate computation, Newman introduced a family of Zermelo-type fixed-point iterations parameterized by $α…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AImath.OCstat.ML2026-07-23

A Defense of the Quadratic Model

Alexandru Meterez, Pranav Ajit Nair, Depen Morwani, Cengiz Pehlevan, Sham Kakade, Alex Damian

Due to the complexity of neural network loss landscapes, optimization theory is forced to rely on idealized models, and there is generally a tradeoff between how theoretically tractable the model is, and how accurately it describes the true optimization dynamics. In this work, we…

View free PDFSource page
arxivstat.MLcs.LGmath.NAmath.ST2026-07-31

Simple-regret rates and minimax optimality of fixed-prior expected improvement in Matérn and squared-exponential RKHSs

Emmanuel Vazquez, Sébastien Petit

We study the expected improvement (EI) policy for minimizing a deterministic objective function $f$ on a nonempty compact set $\mathcal X \subset\mathbb R^d$. We assume that $f$ belongs to the RKHS $\mathcal H_k$ of a continuous positive-semidefinite kernel $k$ on $\mathcal X$. F…

View free PDFSource page
arxivmath.OCcs.AIcs.LGstat.ML2026-07-24

Explicit Iteration Complexity of Exact Data-Driven Inverse Optimization for Integer Linear Programs

Akira Kitaoka

A data-driven inverse optimization problem (DDIOP) is the problem of estimating the objective-function parameters (weights) that explain observed optimal-solution data, and it arises in many applications, including integer linear programming (ILP). It is known that, by applying g…

View free PDFSource page