CORTEXA
← Browse
arxiveess.SY2026-06-27

Q-DASC: State-of-the-Art Safe Quantum Control for HVAC under Local Model Misspecification

Yifan Wang

Variational quantum reinforcement learning offers a compact policy class for building-energy control, but it inherits a deployment weakness shared by learned controllers: when the thermal model is locally wrong, a policy that appears safe on the model can violate occupant comfort in the real building. Guarantees that depend on noisy quantum read-out are also insufficient for safety-critical control. We address this gap with Q-DASC, Discrepancy-Attributed Safe Quantum Control. Q-DASC wraps a variational-quantum-circuit (VQC) policy with a certified classical safety layer that discovers misspecified operating regimes with false-discovery-rate control, repairs their local thermal gains with shrinkage, projects the proposed quantum schedule onto the repaired comfort-feasible set, and attributes residual violations to policy error, model error, or physical limits. Because the final certificate is produced by classical projection, comfort feasibility is invariant to finite-shot and depolarizing read-out noise. On real BOPTEST building emulators across three buildings, two localized misspecifications, and three seeds, Q-DASC reduces average comfort violation from 26.0\% for the raw VQC controller and 55.3\% for a model-trusting scheduler to 0.02\%, matching a clairvoyant oracle, and remains at 0.24\% under NISQ read-out noise. A repair-aware VQC variant reaches 0.00\% violation and reduces projection intervention, while the default Q-DASC keeps lower energy and stronger observational-data behavior. The same wrapper transfers to EnergyPlus heating and cooling benchmarks and to real hospital air-handling-unit data. These results establish a safety-efficiency frontier for deploying quantum policies in physics-constrained control.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.ROeess.SY2026-07-12

D-SafeMPC: Diffusion-Driven Safe Model Predictive Control with Discrete-Time Control Barrier Functions

Erdi Sayar, Ersin Daş, Joel W. Burdick, Alois Knoll, Erdal Kayacan

A key limitation on the use of diffusion models in robotic planning is their inability to inherently enforce safety or dynamical constraints, which often results in physically infeasible or unsafe outputs. Hybrid approaches that employ model predictive control (MPC) to address th…

View free PDFSource page
arxiveess.SYcs.AIcs.RO2026-07-23

Interaction Dynamics Modeling and Predictive Control for Safe Steerable Catheter--Tissue Interaction

Yongyan Cao

Safe steerable catheter control is fundamentally a problem of interaction dynamics: the tip must follow a planned motion, remain compliant against moving tissue, reject friction and hysteresis, and respect a clinically meaningful never-exceed contact-force bound. We formulate cat…

View free PDFSource page
arxiveess.SY2026-07-07

Generalized Feedback Control Modeling Method for Control-Driven Converter Systems

Chen Zhang, Haoxiang Zong, Xu Cai, Marta Molinas

Converters-based systems like wind farms manifest themselves as control-intensive systems, where control-driven stability issues frequently occur, e.g., oscillations. Such issues are popularly studied via circuit impedance-based methods. However, given its implicit controller mod…

View free PDFSource page
arxiveess.SY2026-07-17Cited by 1

Adaptive Model-Based Transfer Learning for Dynamic HVAC Control

Quang-Thang Le, Kevin Wijaya, Hsin-Yi Lai, Che-Kai Liu, Ching-Chun Huang

In this paper, we aim to automate the adjustment of air handling unit (AHU) setpoints within heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems to maintain indoor temperatures at user-specified levels. A key challenge lies in obtaining sufficient high-quality sensor data f…

View free PDFSource page