CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.MMcs.CLcs.HCeess.SP2026-07-19

EII-SCL: Harnessing Emotional Inertia for Multimodal Emotion Recognition in Conversation

Zilong Huang, Kong Aik Lee, Chong-Xin Gan, Zezhong Jin, Ruichen Zuo, Man-Wai Mak

Multimodal emotion recognition in conversation (MERC) achieves accurate predictions by integrating multimodal and contextual information in dialogues. While current MERC approaches focus on modeling complex contextual dependencies in conversation, they often overlook the impact of contextual emotional inertia in emotion shift, leading to sub-optimal performance. To address this issue, we propose a novel Emotional Inertia-Informed Supervised Contrastive Learning module (EII-SCL) that informs the contrastive objective by constructing inertia-affected samples within temporal windows, effectively leveraging emotional inertia as a prior while enabling seamless integration with existing MERC models without requiring additional data. Extensive experiments on IEMOCAP and MELD show that our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.CVcs.HCcs.MM2026-07-13

LightMem-Ego: Your AI Memory for Everyday Life

Yijun Chen, Boyi Xiao, Yixian Zhao, Haoting Xia, Buqiang Xu, Jizhan Fang, et al.

Personal AI assistants on mobile and wearable devices continuously perceive users' daily lives through visual and audio streams. However, answering queries about past experiences requires lightweight multimodal memory that can continuously accumulate, organize, and retrieve long-…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.MMcs.CLcs.LG2026-07-19

EmoEUS: Uncertainty Supervision for Multimodal Emotion Recognition in Conversation

Zilong Huang, Kong Aik Lee, Junjie Li, Zhe Li, Man-Wai Mak

Multimodal emotion recognition in conversation (MERC) can leverage multimodal and contextual cues to boost recognition performance. However, existing fusion approaches in MERC often ignore modality-specific uncertainty across utterances caused by conflicting cues, varying noise,…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.CVcs.MM2026-07-14

Do We Really Need Multimodal Emotion Language Models Larger Than 1B Parameters?

Kaiwen Zheng, Junchen Fu, Wenhao Deng, Hu Han, Joemon M. Jose, Xuri Ge

Recent advances in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have significantly improved the performance of multimodal emotion recognition (MER) and enabled interpretable description generation by jointly modeling video, audio, and language, etc. However, these performance improve…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.HCcs.MM2026-07-03

See the Emotion: A Facial Emoji Proxy Modeling for EEG Emotion Recognition

Jingjing Hu, Guo Dan, Haofan Cheng, Ying Zeng, Zhan Si, Jinxing Zhou, et al.

Despite the high accuracy of EEG-based emotion recognition, existing models remain opaque "black boxes", lacking semantic grounding between abstract neural features and human-interpretable states. In this paper, we reframe EEG explainability as a cross-modal generation task, shif…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.HC2026-07-01

Quantifying the Affective Gap: A Zero-Shot Evaluation of LLMs on Fine-Grained Emotion Taxonomies

Lawrence Obiuwevwi, Krzysztof J. Rechowicz, Jessica M. Johnson, Vikas Ashok, Sachin Shetty, Sampath Jayarathna

Emotion recognition in natural language is a foundational challenge in affective computing, with critical implications for human-computer interaction, mental health support, and conversational AI. This paper presents a rigorous, unified zero-shot evaluation of three leading comme…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-16

Memory-Driven Self-Disclosure and Relational Turning Points: A Longitudinal Multimodal Study of Human-AI Interaction

Ryuichi Sumida, Mao Saeki, Masaki Eguchi, Sadahiro Yoshikawa, Koji Inoue, Tatsuya Kawahara, et al.

As conversational AI systems are designed for repeated use, a central question is how a series of interactions becomes a relationship. We present a longitudinal multimodal study of a memory-augmented conversational agent (24 participants x 10 sessions), in which participants rate…

View free PDFSource page