CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AI2026-07-02

Generic Expert Coverage for Pruning SparseMixture-of-Experts Language Models

Yongqin Zeng, Sicheng Pan, Jiale Wang, Hai-tao Zheng, Hong-Gee Kim, Chunxia Ma, XiuTeng Zhou

Sparsely activated Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models contain substantial structured redundancy among routed experts, but pruning them without downstream calibration data remains challenging. Existing expert-pruning methods typically rely on a single aggregated importance score, which can bias the retained set toward experts favored by dominant calibration patterns. We propose \textbf{Generic TB-Coverage}, a coverage-aware expert pruning method that uses only generic text corpora (WikiText2 and C4) for calibration. Instead of collapsing expert utility into one score, our method profiles per-expert utility separately on each corpus and enforces a fixed-budget coverage rule that preserves high-utility experts from each corpus before constructing the final pruning mask. Across Qwen1.5-MoE-A2.7B and DeepSeek-MoE-16B-Base at 25\%, 50\%, and 75\% retention budgets, our method improves average accuracy on six common zero-shot benchmarks over random pruning, REAP, and ExpertSparsity, while also reducing perplexity degradation on WikiText2 and C4. The gains are largest under aggressive pruning (25\% and 50\% retain), suggesting that preserving cross-corpus expert coverage is an effective generic-data prior for MoE pruning. Our improvements hold with fixed pruning budgets and no downstream calibration data.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-01

On the Utility and Factual Reliability of Pruned Mixture-of-Experts Models in the Biomedical Domain

Atsuki Yamaguchi, Szymon Palucha, Léo Bijar, Aline Villavicencio, Nikolaos Aletras

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models offer inference speedups via selective activation but impose substantial memory requirements because the whole network must remain loaded. Structured expert pruning is a practical approach for reducing deployment costs in resource-constrained setti…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-09

Structured Pruning of Large Language Models via Power Transformation and Sign-Preserving Score Aggregation with Adaptive Feature Retention

Ryota Kobayashi, Tsubasa Hirakawa, Takayoshi Yamashita, Hironobu Fujiyoshi, Yasunori Ishii, Tomoyuki Okuno, et al.

This paper proposes an improved structured pruning method for large language models (LLMs) that addresses key challenges in adapting Adaptive Feature Retention (AFR), an unstructured pruning technique, to structured pruning. When applying AFR to structured pruning, three major pr…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-02

A rubric-based controlled comparison of frontier language models on expert-authored clinical reasoning tasks

Samiha A. Ismail, Fan X. Chen, Ali Merali

Multiple-choice medical benchmarks are increasingly saturated, and recent rubric-based evaluations such as HealthBench have shown that open-ended clinical performance is far from solved - its "Hard" subset top score remains 32%. We present a small, deliberately difficult evaluati…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-02

Subliminal Clocks: Latent Time Modelling in Diffusion Language Models

Maximo Eduardo Rulli, Thomas Vaitses Fontanari, Simone Petruzzi, Federico Alvetreti, Giorgio Strano, Donato Crisostomi, et al.

Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) have recently emerged as a promising alternative to autoregressive models. Unlike standard diffusion-based approaches, DLMs are not explicitly conditioned on a timestep, raising a natural question: do these models internally represent denoising pr…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.MA2026-06-30

TreeAgent: A Generalizable Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Bias Labeling in Forestry via Compiled Expert Rules and Vision-Language Models

Shiyi Chen, Nicholas Saban, Collin Hargreaves, Huiqi Wang

Human-labeled data are widely used as reference annotations in ML, despite known variability across annotators in many expert-driven domains. In addition, expert annotation is slow, inconsistent, and remains a major bottleneck for scaling tasks like tree height bias classificatio…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIstat.ML2026-07-13

Are we Merging the Right Models? Impact of Expert Training Duration on Model Merging for LLMs

Nikita Kozodoi, Zainab Afolabi, Jack Butler

Multi-task model merging combines separately trained expert models into a single model that handles all tasks without co-training. Standard practice merges experts at their optimal validation loss. We challenge this convention by systematically studying how training duration of d…

View free PDFSource page