CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AI2026-07-10

Fictional Worldbuilding: Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration with Hierarchical Context Compression and Iterative Review

Jingbo Chen, He Wang, Wei Yuan, Yuqiao Lai, Zhenyan Lu

Worldbuilding, the construction of coherent fictional worlds, is a foundational task in game design and literary creation. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer new possibilities for automated content generation, but their application to worldbuilding faces three challenges: context explosion that grows linearly with the building process, the tension between creative diversity and content consistency, and the absence of automated quality assurance. This paper presents AutoWorldBuilder, a multi-agent collaborative system that addresses these challenges through five integrated components: a structured concept network with conflict detection; a DAG-based hybrid batch scheduler that groups tasks by semantic locality; a four-layer context compression mechanism achieving approximately 90% token reduction; an iterative review system with specialized Auditor agents that improves proposal pass rates from 42% to over 85%; and a skill-driven agent architecture supporting zero-code extension with differentiated temperature configuration. Two experiments across 20 diverse worldbuilding tasks, using GPT-OSS 120B and DeepSeek v3.2 as LLM backends, demonstrate a 95.0% success rate. The system generated 56-103 self-consistent concepts per world in 18-31 minutes with zero-conflict delivery. The architectural patterns validated here, including layer-as-budget compression, semantic-locality scheduling, and separation of generation and review, transfer to the broader class of knowledge-intensive, multi-agent LLM applications.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AI2026-07-16

Precise but Uncoupled: Reviewer Precision Does Not Guarantee Critique Uptake in Multi-Agent Math Reasoning

Chih-Hsuan Yang, Jingyan Jiang, Vikram Vasudevan, Cheng-Hau Yang, Huihuo Zheng, Le Chen, et al.

Many math- and science-oriented agent systems use hierarchical designs with specialized reviewer roles, assuming that a dedicated review stage should help turn wrong candidates into correct ones. We test this assumption on 4,181 verifier-grounded Omni-MATH problems using matched…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.MAcs.AI2026-07-21

Strategy-Following Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Considering Control Strategies Provided to Other Agents

Yamato Takahagi, Gentoku Nakasone, Yoshinari Motokawa, Toshiharu Sugawara

This study proposes a learning method for multi-agent systems that allows agents to be controlled through human manager instructions after learning and enables uninstructed agents to implicitly complement the overall work based on the actions of other agents. Multi-agent applicat…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.ETcs.MA2026-07-17

AgentFAIR: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for FAIRness Evaluation of Geospatial Datasets

Ming Chen, Pranav Pai

Geospatial datasets support applications from urban planning to climate modeling, yet consistent assessment of FAIR compliance is difficult. Existing evaluators use different rubrics and evidence sources and may fail on JavaScript-rendered pages or repository-specific identifiers…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-17

When Do Multi-Agent Systems Help? An Information Bottleneck Perspective

Wendi Yu, Lianhao Zhou, Xiangjue Dong, Sai Sudarshan Barath, Declan Staunton, Byung-Jun Yoon, et al.

LLM powered multi-agent systems (MAS) have emerged as a promising paradigm for complex tasks. However, their advantages over single-agent systems (SAS) remain unclear, with performance varying inconsistently across settings. Here, we provide an information bottleneck perspective…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-07-10

L-MAD: A Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Agent Debate Structures in Legal Reasoning

Tan-Minh Nguyen, Hoang-Trung Nguyen, Huu-Dong Nguyen, Dinh-Truong Do, Thi-Hai-Yen Vuong, Le-Minh Nguyen

While multi-agent debate (MAD) frameworks have shown significant potential in general reasoning, their effectiveness in highly structured, knowledge-heavy legal domains remains under-explored. In this work, we introduce the Legal Multi-Agent Debate (L-MAD) framework to systematic…

View free PDFSource page