CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CLcs.LG2026-07-19

Team DACTYL at PAN 2026: Bayesian Data Mixing and Empirical X-risk Minimization for AI-text Detection

Shantanu Thorat

Existing research shows that AI-generated text detection classifiers achieve strong in-distribution (ID) performance but do not maintain the same performance on out-of-distribution (OOD) texts, suggesting overfitting to dataset-specific features. However, combining different training datasets doesn't always improve performance and, in some cases, can even encourage shortcut learning. To address this issue, we fine-tune BERT-tiny models with Bayesian classification heads to select texts across three different datasets to use as a consolidated training set. We trained three different classifiers: fine-tuned DeBERTa-V3-large and ModernBERT-large classifiers via empirical X-risk minimization, and an MCGrad model that calibrates the predictions from the ModernBERT-large classifier. The DeBERTa-V3-large-large classifier achieves a mean score of 0.882 on the PAN 2026 test set across five metrics: AUROC, $F_1$, C@1, Brier score, and $F_{0.5u}$. ModernBERT-large achieves a score of 0.96 while MCGrad achieves the best score of the three with a mean score of 0.974, ranking second on the leaderboard. Our results highlight that careful dataset curation can lead to strong OOD performance. We release our ModernBERT-large and DeBERTa-V3-large models at https://huggingface.co/collections/ShantanuT01/panclef-2026 .

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.CL2026-07-04

Rethinking AI-Generated Text Detection: A Strong Baseline and the Distribution-Shift Problem That Remains

Zhuoer Shen, Mingyi Wang, Shaofeng Zou, Yuheng Bu

Recent AI-generated text detection work often introduces a new benchmark together with a specialized detector tailored to it. We revisit this practice from a baseline-first perspective. Across several benchmarks, we show that a plain, fully fine-tuned RoBERTa matches or exceeds t…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.CL2026-07-01

MolSafeEval: A Benchmark for Uncovering Safety Risks in AI-Generated Molecules

Tong Xu, Xinzhe Cao, Zhihui Zhu, Keyan Ding, Huajun Chen

Current molecular generation benchmarks emphasize task complexity, molecule novelty, and property alignment; they largely overlook a critical concern: the potential safety risks of AI-generated molecules. In practice, many generative models may produce molecules with toxic, react…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.DBcs.LG2026-06-29

How Far Do On-Prem Open LLMs Get on Text-to-SQL? A Cross-Family Size x Technique Frontier on BIRD

Vladimir Beskorovainyi

Organizations that cannot send data to a cloud API increasingly ask: how good is Text-to-SQL if the model must run on-premises on open weights, and which popular accuracy "recipes" are worth their compute? We answer with an honest, fully reproducible benchmark on the BIRD develop…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.DLcs.IRcs.LG2026-07-10

Letting the Data Speak: Extracting Keywords from Crowdsourced Collections with AI

Miguel Arana-Catania, Catherine Conisbee, Matthew Kidd

Identifying and assigning keywords at scale is a technical, practical, and ethical challenge for crowdsourced collections. This article reports the findings of the "Extracting Keywords from Crowdsourced Collections" project, which used the Their Finest Hour Online Archive, a crow…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-02

HERMES: A Multi-Granularity Labeling Substrate for Pre-training Data Mixtures

Ziyun Qiao, Yue Min, Ruining Chen, Yujun Li

Most data-mixing methods assume the corpus has already been partitioned into groups, and the choice of those groups determines what a mixer can express. Existing labels, including provenance, topic or format taxonomies, and flat embedding clusters, commit to one semantic axis at…

View free PDFSource page