CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.CVcs.HC2026-07-31

FriendBench: Benchmarking Dyadic Familiarity Inference in Humans and Multimodal Large Language Models

Jeffrey M. Girard, Jason Z. Zheng, Jacqueline R. Vertino, Antony D'Avirro, Benjamin Peloquin

Reading a social situation often depends on behavior, not words alone. We introduce FriendBench, a benchmark for inferring whether two people are already familiar or are meeting as strangers, from a 20-second clip of a dyadic ice-breaker conversation. Every pair answers the same type of prompt, so only the manner of interaction can reveal the answer. Across text, audio, and video, we compare 26 models from seven companies against matched human panels over 96 balanced dyads. The best model and the human crowd are statistically indistinguishable on accuracy in every modality, but reach it differently: humans stay balanced across the two answers, while the strongest models lean toward "stranger"---a difference in effective prior, not discrimination. Richer channels help both unequally, and only humans gain from visible behavior on top of speech. We release the stimuli, human ratings, and model predictions.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.CVcs.RO2026-07-24

Zero-Shot Mission-Level Evaluation for Aerial MLLM Agents

Suman Navaratnarajah, Taehyoung Kim, Jona Ruthardt, Ishaan Bhimwal, Ryousuke Yamada, Yannik Blei, et al.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are emerging as core reasoning modules for embodied agents, yet it remains unclear how well general-purpose models can solve long-horizon embodied tasks from a single high-level instruction. We introduce MissionBench, a benchmark for missi…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-24

Why Large Language Models and Humans Converge and Diverge in Evaluating Creativity

Pengzhao Lyu, Yeun Joon Kim, Hanlin Xiao, Yingyue Luna Luan

Despite the growing use of large language models (LLMs) as creativity evaluators, evidence of their alignment with human evaluations remains mixed, raising the question of when and why their judgments converge with or diverge from human judgments. Across three studies and six wid…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-24

From Isolated Tasks to Structured Capabilities: A Multilayer Taxonomy for Large Language Models

Shixin Fang, Jiachen Wo, Wenjuan Qin, Sihang Jiang, Yanghua Xiao

Large language model (LLM) evaluation spans diverse tasks and benchmarks, yet evidence remains organized around tasks rather than the capabilities they probe. This fragmentation limits cross-study comparison, obscures capabilities tasks recruit, and makes coverage gaps difficult…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-24

Benchmarking Fine-tuning and Retrieval Strategies for a Multimodal Language Model on the NRC Reactor Operator Licensing Examination

Isak Hwang, Yoon Pyo Lee

The integration of large language models (LLMs) into the nuclear power industry requires outputs grounded in domain-specific knowledge. This study evaluates a 31-billion-parameter open-weight multimodal model (Gemma 4 31B-IT) on its capacity to apply nuclear knowledge by benchmar…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.HC2026-07-23

MedGame: Storytelling Gamification Empowered by Large Language Models for Medical Education

Qian Wu, Xinrong Zhou, Zizhan Ma, Kai Chen, Zheyao Gao, Xun Lin, et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise for medical education, but most existing systems focus on localized interactions such as question answering or single-turn feedback, rather than organizing an entire clinical case into a decision-centered learning trajectory. We introduce…

View free PDFSource page