CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AI2026-06-28

Flow Reasoning Models: Scaling Reasoning Through Iterative Self-Refinement

Alec Helbling, Andrey Bryutkin, Mauro Martino, Nima Dehmamy, Hendrik Strobelt

Discrete flow models have recently shown promising performance on few-step text generation; however, when naively applied to structured reasoning tasks such as Sudoku and Zebra puzzles, they converge confidently to incorrect answers (solving only $\sim$36% of Sudoku puzzles). We introduce Flow Reasoning Models (FRMs), a training and test-time-scaling framework for structured reasoning with flow models. We make the observation that, despite their poor solve rate, flow models can act as their own verifiers. A correct answer is a stable fixed point of the denoising dynamics, returning to itself when re-noised and re-solved. This enables a test-time-scaling paradigm: propose many candidate solutions and keep those that are dynamically stable, which alone reaches high solve rates on Sudoku-Shah (~$100\%$) and Zebra ($95.9\%$). This even generalizes to harder out-of-distribution puzzles like Sudoku-Extreme ($96.1\%$), without ever training on that distribution. This pure search, however, wastes a great deal of computation generating incorrect candidate solutions. We therefore design a training recipe to improve the base model's efficiency. First, we train flow models with a self-conditioning channel and close it at inference, letting them refine their own past predictions. Second, we train models to avoid their own failed generations using direct preference optimization. These changes substantially improve the base model's efficiency, letting it reach $99.2\%$ on Sudoku in just $7$ forward passes, over $8\times$ fewer than the strongest matched masked-diffusion baseline we compare needs for the same accuracy. When combined with test-time scaling, this lets flow models solve hard out-of-distribution puzzles (e.g. Sudoku-Extreme) far more efficiently.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AI2026-07-08

Recursive Self-Improvement in AI: From Bounded Self-Refinement to Autonomous Research Loops

Mingguang Chen, Licheng Wang, Bo Qu

AI systems increasingly participate in their own improvement: revising their outputs, adapting their own harnesses during deployment, training on data they generate, and, increasingly, conducting AI research itself. This literature is described under a vocabulary ("self-refine,"…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-01

Self-conditioned Flow Map Language Models via Fixed-point Flows

Jaehoon Yoo, Wonjung Kim, Floor Eijkelboom, Chanhyuk Lee, Nicholas M. Boffi, Seunghoon Hong, et al.

Self-conditioning is a core technique that enhances continuous flow-based language models, where the model learns to denoise generated text by conditioning on its own denoising estimate. While empirically successful, its performance improvements are poorly understood. Moreover, t…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-06-26

Towards Reliable and Robust LLM Planning: Symbolic Feedback-Driven Iterative Self-Refinement Framework

Jiajing Zhang, Jiamei Jiang, Chenyang Zhang, Feifei Mo, Linjing Li, Daniel Zeng

Large language models (LLMs) have attracted widespread attention from academia and industry, yet their deployment raises critical security concerns regarding robustness and reliability. Planning, a core component of intelligent behavior, remains challenging for LLMs, which often…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-07-18

FUSAR-R1: A Large-Scale Reasoning Model for Intelligent Interpretation of SAR Images

Yi Yang, Xiaokun Zhang, Yuxuan Li, Ruyi Zhang, Xinpeng Zhou, Haipeng Wang

In recent years, large-scale vision-language models have been driving a paradigm shift in intelligent remote sensing image interpretation. By incorporating textual semantic information, the cognitive expression, semantic understanding, and human-computer interaction capabilities…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-07-22

EvoThink: Evolving Thinking in Large Reasoning Models via Self-Pruning and Aha-Moment Preference Optimization

Xinbang Dai, Zheyu Xin, Huikang Hu, Lin Ren, Rihui Jin, Guohui Xiao, et al.

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often suffer from overthinking due to redundant verification steps. Existing approaches for mitigating overthinking, such as fast-slow thinking switching and reasoning trajectory compression, fail to make a fine-grained distinction between beneficial…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-13

Self-Consistent Flow: Unifying Velocity and Endpoint Prediction for Rectified Flow Models

Xu Han, Jiajing Hu, Li-Ping Liu

In rectified-flow-based generative models, the neural network can be trained to predict two different targets, such as the instantaneous velocity or the data endpoint, to perform denoising. Although prior work shows that these parameterizations lead to different empirical behavio…

View free PDFSource page