CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.OS2026-07-20

TRIM: Reducing AI-Generated CodeSlop via Agent Trajectory Minimization

Alex Mathai, Shobini Iyer, Aleksandr Nogikh, Petros Maniatis, Franjo Ivancic, Junfeng Yang, Baishakhi Ray

Coding agents are increasingly used to accelerate code generation in many downstream tasks, such as fixing bugs, building applications, and prototyping. However, despite their value as coding assistants, agent-generated code tends to be larger and more verbose than the corresponding human-written implementation. In this work, we show that the cause lies in the agent's own search process: while iterating toward a passing solution, an agent accumulates speculative edits, abandoned hypotheses, and temporary changes that persist into the final patch. This may seem harmless for a single patch, but the problem compounds as agents take responsibility for ever-larger portions of a codebase-a codebase that was once minimal and well-maintained slowly accumulates redundancy faster than it can be cleaned up, drifting to a state that is harder to maintain. Given the magnitude of this problem, we take a step towards alleviating this issue. First, we formally define this phenomenon as CodeSlop-the residual and functionally unnecessary edits commonly seen in AI-generated code. We then introduce our algorithm TRIM (Trajectory-guided Redundancy Identification and Minimization). Rather than minimizing CodeSlop directly, TRIM instead minimizes agent trajectories. As we show empirically, this indirect technique of minimizing CodeSlop is highly effective: TRIM cuts CodeSlop by 17.9%-32.9% across agentic scaffolds, with negligible performance regression. TRIM is also highly efficient, requiring roughly half the validation cost of algorithmic baselines such as Delta Debugging.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-07-31

From Code Review to Code Critique: Intent, Drift, and Spotlight for AI-Generated Diffs at Scale

Chandra Maddila, Mashrur Rashik, Euna Mehnaz Khan, Smriti Jha, James Saindon, Nachi Nagappan, et al.

AI coding agents are generating code at volumes that exceed the capacity of traditional peer review. At the same time, existing AI code review tools over-index on low-value suggestions such as style and best practices while under-indexing on the concerns human reviewers prioritiz…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.MAcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-17

Automated Hardware Validation Test Plan Generation for Large Scale AI Datacenter Platforms Using a Generative AI Multi-Agents Architecture

Mohammed-Khalil Ghali, Saurabh Kulkarni, Prathamesh Kulkarni, Rohan Kulkarni, Sangwon Yoon, Daehan Won

Large-scale AI datacenter platforms comprise thousands of heterogeneous hardware components whose validation requires comprehensive fault injection test plans. Today these plans are authored manually: engineers review hardware self-healing validation documents and bills of materi…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.MAcs.SE2026-07-31

Beyond Component Testing: Validating Agentic AI Systems

Fabio Orazio Mirto, Luca D'Agati, Giuseppe Tricomi, Stefano Silvestri, Francesco Longo, Antonio Puliafito, et al.

Agentic AI systems act through multi-step trajectories that combine planning, tool use, memory, interaction, and adaptation. This behavior stretches validation practice beyond component testing and one-shot input--output evaluation, because acceptable system behavior now depends…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.DCcs.MA2026-07-02

LLMoxie: Exploring Agentic AI for Scientific Software Development

Landung Setiawan, Anant Mittal, Cordero Core, Anshul Tambay, Carlos Garcia Jurado Suarez, David A. C. Beck, et al.

In this paper, we describe LLMoxie, an institutional AI platform whose three-tiered architecture supports multi-cloud and on-premise inference, a LiteLLM/MLflow control plane for authentication, budgeting, PII masking, and observability, and an application augmentation layer for…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-07-10

Failure as a Process: An Anatomy of CLI Coding Agent Trajectories

Xiangxin Zhao, Han Li, Shuaiting Li, Tianyi Zhao, Earl T. Barr, Federica Sarro, et al.

Large language model (LLM) coding agents are increasingly deployed to autonomously perform software engineering tasks in terminal-based environments, making their reliability a growing concern. Existing empirical studies investigate why coding agents fail, yet they largely treat…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-07-19

Specifying the Delegated-Autonomy Boundary: Requirements Engineering for Agentic AI

Chetan Arora, Andreas Vogelsang, Abbi Sharma

Agentic AI systems do not just predict or recommend; they plan, maintain state, and act in external environments with varying degrees of autonomy. This changes the requirements engineering problem in a specific and under-addressed way: it introduces what we call the delegated-aut…

View free PDFSource page