CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LG2026-07-06

RL-Ballast: Ship Ballast Water Path Planning and Clog Prediction via Reinforcement Learning

Ming-Kuan Lin, Yi-Chung Lai, Ming-Hsin Chiang, Tsung-Wei Pan, Jung-Hua Wang

Under the Shipping 4.0 paradigm, autonomous and reduced-crew vessels require intelligent internal systems to maintain operational safety and structural stability. Ballast-water control is essential for ship trim and integrity, but conventional rule-based or manual approaches have limited adaptability to hydraulic anomalies such as valve failures and pipe blockages, and often depend on dense pressure or flow sensors for diagnosis. To address these limitations, this paper proposes RL-Ballast, a graph-based deep reinforcement learning framework for adaptive ballast-water path planning and sensor-frugal blockage candidate scoring. The valve-permutation problem is transformed into 54 feasible fluid-transfer routes generated using graph theory and depth-first search. The partially observable ballast environment is approximated with frame-stacked tank levels and action outcomes, allowing the agent to infer hidden blockage effects without explicitly modeling a high-dimensional POMDP. During deterministic inference, episode-level failed-action memory and dynamic action masking prevent repeated ineffective actions and support immediate rerouting. Failed transfer histories are further accumulated to rank suspicious valves or pipe segments without dense instrumentation. Monte Carlo simulations show that RL-Ballast completes all unexpected single-blockage scenarios and reduces average decision steps from 61.0 to 41.5 compared with a Dijkstra rule-based baseline. For diagnostic support, the failure-history scoring scheme achieves a 100% Top-3 hit rate, a 66.7% strict Top-1 hit rate, and an 83.3% Top-1 tie-hit rate under serially indistinguishable blockage conditions. These results suggest that RL-Ballast enables adaptive rerouting and maintenance-oriented blockage diagnosis under limited sensing conditions.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-14

SteinGate: Tail-Sensitive Safe Reinforcement Learning via Stein Discrepancy

Yassine Chemingui, Chenhua Fan, Honghao Wei, Janardhan Rao Doppa

Safe reinforcement learning typically enforces safety by bounding expected cumulative costs, a criterion that often fails to detect rare but catastrophic tail events. To overcome these limitations, this paper introduces SteinGate, a boundary-aware distributional safety certificat…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGq-fin.RM2026-07-15

A Noise-Robust Elicit-to-Optimize Framework for Distortion Riskmetrics via Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Yang Liu, Yuhao Liu, Yunran Wei

We propose a noise-robust elicit-to-optimize framework that integrates inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) and reinforcement learning (RL) for eliciting agents' risk preferences and optimizing policies under a broad class of risk objectives characterized by distortion riskmetric…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-13

Learning Residual Kinematic Corrections for Continuous Neural Decoding via Reinforcement Learning

Jiamian Li, Niall McShane, Attila Korik, Naomi du Bois, Karl McCreadie, Leen Jabban, et al.

Decoding continuous three-dimensional (3D) motor imagery (MI) using non-invasive electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain--computer interfaces (BCIs) remains challenging due to signal variability and residual decoding errors. Deep learning architectures such as convolutional neur…

View free PDFSource page