CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-16

WrAFT: a Modularized Automated Writing Evaluation System for Argumentative Essays

Adnan Labib, Yixuan Huang, Jiahui Wu, John Maurice Gayed, Zheng Yuan, Qiao Wang

This study presents WrAFT, a Writing Assessment and Feedback Tool, that delivers both accurate and reliable scores and effective comprehensive feedback to argumentative essays. WrAFT adopts a modular design by dividing automated writing evaluation (AWE) tasks into scoring, surface-level feedback, and deep-level feedback. In building the system, various Large Language Models (LLMs) have been evaluated, including LLaMA-3.3-70B-Instruct, GPT-4o, and Claude 3.7, through both direct prompting and supervised fine-tuning approaches. A proprietary dataset of 480 TOEFL Independent Writing essays with official benchmark scores was utilized. Benchmark-based evaluation shows that WrAFT achieves state-of-the-art performance in scoring, with a quadratic weighted kappa (QWK) of 0.84 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.44 against official scores on a scale of 0-5. Human evaluation of system-generated feedback also reveals high approval ratings: 96.14 percent for surface-level feedback, 93.03 percent for deep-level macro feedback, and 94.69 percent for deep-level micro feedback. An interactive user interface has been developed for the system and is publicly available and free to use.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.IRcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG2026-06-29

SABER-Math: Automated Benchmark for Information Retrieval Evaluation in Mathematics

Nikolay Georgiev, Maria Drencheva, Kseniia Ibragimova, Ivo Petrov, Dimitar I. Dimitrov, Martin Vechev

As agentic AI systems tackle more complex mathematical tasks, they increasingly rely on information retrieval (IR) to search problem databases, theorem libraries, and educational resources. However, choosing the right retriever remains difficult, as it is infeasible to directly i…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-06-30

SEFORA: Student Essays with Feedback Corpus and LLM Feedback Evaluation Framework

Shayan Peyghambari Oskoui, Norah Almousa, Zhaoyi Joey Hou, Carolina Gustafson, Gayle Rogers, Raquel Coelho, et al.

Effective writing feedback is among the strongest drivers of student learning, yet producing it at scale is labor-intensive. LLMs offer a natural path to scaling writing support, but two gaps stand in the way: few public corpora capture how instructors actually deliver feedback i…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-21

Beyond Score Prediction: LLM-Based Essay Scoring and Feedback Generation via Reinforcement Learning with Rubric Rewards

Xuefeng Jin, Jiashuo Zhang, Teng Cao, Bin Yang

Large language models (LLMs) have been widely applied to automated essay scoring (AES) and automated feedback generation (AFG). However, existing studies rely primarily on prompt engineering or supervised fine-tuning, while systematic research on reinforcement learning (RL) post-…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-06-29

SIMAX: A Scalable and Interpretable Framework for Multi-Fidelity and Annotated Clinician-Patient Dialogue Simulation

Zhuhan Bao, Rui Yang, Bohao Yang, Zhiyi Liu, Sicheng Shu, Ruio Heerschap, et al.

Background. The widespread deployment of ambient digital scribes is driving large-scale capture of clinician-patient dialogues. Human coding of clinical communication data remains costly, inconsistent, and difficult to scale, motivating AI-driven communication coding systems. How…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.IR2026-07-21

AILQA: Evaluating AI-Driven Legal Question Answering Systems for the Indian Legal System

Shubham Kumar Nigam, Shubham Kumar Mishra, Noel Shallum, Kripabandhu Ghosh, Arnab Bhattacharya

This comprehensive study introduces an advanced Artificial Intelligence for Indian Legal Question Answering (AILQA) system tailored to the Indian legal context. AILQA leverages a variety of embedding and generative models, including recent Large Language Models (LLMs), to address…

View free PDFSource page