CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-06-25

Narrative-UFET: Narrative Generation for Ultra-Fine Entity Typing

Mreedul Gupta, Advait Deshmukh, Ashwin Umadi, Matt Pauk, Maria Leonor Pacheco

Ultra-fine entity typing (UFET) assigns highly specific types to entity mentions, but current approaches struggle with types in the long tail. We hypothesize that a key limitation is the reliance on sentence-level context, since disambiguating evidence is often spread across multiple sentences. Testing this has been difficult because all existing UFET resources are sentence-level. We present Narrative-UFET, a controlled extension of UFET in which each entity mention is paired with an automatically generated short, coherent narrative. Synthesizing narratives lets us isolate the effect of specific discourse properties. We experiment with two paired variants: one in which the entity's type is held constant across the narrative (Maintain) and one in which it shifts (Change). We show that narrative context yields consistent improvements on long-tail types over sentence-level baselines, with the Change variant providing the stronger signal. A comparison against naturally occurring contexts shows that synthetic narratives yield stronger gains, indicating that controlled discourse construction can surface signals that real text leaves implicit. Substantial room for improvement remains, suggesting open directions in both discourse modeling and narrative construction.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.MA2026-07-01

From Personas to Plot: Character-Grounded Multi-Agent Story Generation for Long-Form Narratives

Aayush Aluru, Chloe Ho, Muhammad Hammouri, Kerry Luo, Myra Malik, Ryan Lagasse, et al.

Although large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive creative fiction generation, they struggle to maintain narrative consistency and coherent plot lines in long-form stories. In this work, we introduce a unified framework for long-form narrative generation and veri…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.HC2026-07-15

Measuring How Students Rely on Generative AI in Academic Writing: Development and Multi-Source Validation of the Generative AI Reliance Types Scale (GenAI-RTS)

Shahin Hossain, Tukhbita Afroz Nawmi

As generative AI (GenAI) becomes increasingly embedded in undergraduate academic writing, how students rely on these tools, rather than simply whether they use them, has become a central question for learning, academic integrity, and educational equity. Existing measures of relia…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-03

Conditional Diffusion Guided Knowledge Transfer for Multi-Domain Knowledge Graph Completion

Jiawei Sheng, Taoyu Su, Xixun Lin, Xiaodong Li, Tingwen Liu

Multi-domain knowledge graph completion (MKGC) aims to improve missing triple prediction in a target KG by transferring knowledge from other support KGs. Existing methods typically enforce consistency constraints on equivalent entities across KGs to transfer knowledge, which risk…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.CV2026-07-06

BaFCo: A Document Understanding Benchmark for Complex Bangla Form Comprehension

Abu Tyeb Azad, Ishita Sur Apan, Fahim Ahmed, Sumaiya Karim Katha, Ezharuddin Jubaer, Armun Alam, et al.

Document comprehension is a challenging yet impactful task for Multimodal Large Language Models, especially as these systems see growing adoption in real-world, human-centric applications. However, this adoption is limited for low-resource languages such as Bangla due to the scar…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-06-26

Can LLMs Judge Better Than They Generate? Evaluating Task Asymmetry, Mechanistic Interpretability and Transferability for In-Context QA

Sambaran Bandyopadhyay

LLM-as-a-Judge and self-evaluation pipelines implicitly assume that evaluation is easier than generation. We test this in a controlled in-context QA setting where a context passage is the sole information source and each model judges the answer it generated, removing the parametr…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-10

Deceptive Grounding: Entity Attribution Failure in Clinical Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Cedric Caruzzo, Donggeun Yoo, Tae Soo Kim

Retrieval-augmented generation evaluation checks whether model claims are factually grounded in retrieved documents. It does not check whether retrieved evidence is attributed to the correct entity. A clinical RAG response can pass every automated check (zero hallucinations, near…

View free PDFSource page