CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-08

Single-Rollout Asynchronous Optimization for Agentic Reinforcement Learning

Zhenyu Hou, Yujiang Li, Jie Tang, Yuxiao Dong

Reinforcement learning (RL) is becoming increasingly important for post-training large language models (LLMs). Previous RL pipelines for LLMs were mostly synchronous and batch-interleaved, which is inefficient for long-horizon agentic tasks. Recently, asynchronous RL has emerged as a more efficient alternative by updating the model as rollouts arrive. However, existing asynchronous RL systems often emphasize throughput, while leaving training stability and task effectiveness largely underexplored. For example, a key challenge is that group-wise sampling in the widely-used GRPO framework does not naturally fit asynchronous agentic training. In this paper, we present Single-rollout Asynchronous Optimization (SAO) to address the stability and off-policy challenges in asynchronous RL. To reduce off-policy effects and improve generalization, we replace group-wise sampling with single-rollout sampling, that is, using one rollout per prompt. We further improve this single-rollout strategy with practical value-model training designs. To improve optimization stability, we introduce a strict double-side token-level clipping strategy. SAO is able to train stably for one thousand steps and consistently outperform GRPO and its variants on agentic coding and reasoning benchmarks, such as SWE-Bench Verified, BeyondAIME, and IMOAnswerBench. We also demonstrate that single-rollout RL is particularly effective in a simulated online learning setting, where the model must adapt to changing evolving environments. To this end, SAO is successfully deployed in the agentic RL pipeline for training the open GLM-5.2 model (750B-A40B).

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-06-28

CRAFT: Counterfactual Credit Assignment from Free Sibling Rollouts for Self-Distilled Agentic Reinforcement Learning

Zibin Meng, Kani Chen

Self-distilled agentic reinforcement learning augments trajectory-level reward with a token-level distillation loss, using as its teacher the same policy conditioned on privileged context. The prevailing recipe gates this loss by a single scalar, the teacher-student log-probabili…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-06-30

TRIAGE: Role-Typed Credit Assignment for Agentic Reinforcement Learning

Yuanda Xu, Zhengze Zhou, Hejian Sang, Xiaomin Li, Jiaxin Zhang, Xinchen Du, et al.

Agentic reinforcement learning requires assigning credit to environment-facing actions such as searches, clicks, edits, navigation commands, and object interactions. Standard GRPO uses the final verifier outcome as a uniform advantage over all action tokens. This outcome signal i…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CLcs.OS2026-07-19

WAR: Workload-Aware Rollouts for Synchronous Agentic Reinforcement Learning

Ryan Xu, Atlas Zhao, David Bao, Frank Du

Long-horizon rollout generation has become the dominant systems bottleneck in agentic reinforcement learning (RL). As agents interact with environments over many turns, trajectories rapidly grow to tens of thousands of tokens, making synchronous RL training increasingly constrain…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-08

Entropy Pacing Policy Optimization for Multi-Task Agentic Reinforcement Learning

Zetian Hu, Shunyu Liu, Junjie Zhang, Yongcheng Jing, Ting-En Lin, Yongbin Li, et al.

Recent breakthroughs of Reinforcement Learning (RL) have highlighted its potential for complex agentic Large Language Model (LLM) tasks. However, existing efforts largely focus on single-task settings, whereas real-world deployment necessitates a generalist agent capable of solvi…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.MA2026-07-06

Relational Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Pricing in High-Speed Railway Markets

Enrique Adrian Villarrubia-Martin, David Muñoz-Valero, Luis Rodriguez-Benitez, Giovanni Montana, Luis Jimenez-Linares

In liberalised railway systems, operators must set prices dynamically in an environment with partial observability, as they retain private information about their objectives and performance, where regulatory constraints prohibit communication or direct information exchange betwee…

View free PDFSource page