CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivecon.THcs.AIcs.CYcs.GTcs.HC2026-07-06

Strategic Buying Agents

Mingyang Fu, Ming Hu

Agentic AI is shifting online shopping from search toward delegated purchasing, where autonomous buying agents monitor markets and decide when to buy on a consumer's behalf. We study the design of such strategic buying agents, which must decide when to purchase within a finite shopping window, translating price observations, the remaining time horizon, and beliefs about future price changes into a purchase policy. We formulate this problem across three information regimes: stationary, Bayesian, and robust, and treat the resulting optimal policies as a policy menu for implementation. In the stationary regime, price adjustments follow a Poisson arrival process with a known post-adjustment price distribution; the optimal policy is a dynamic purchase-threshold rule, with the threshold governed by an ordinary differential equation. In the Bayesian regime, the adjustment intensity is known, but the price-adjustment distribution is uncertain; the optimal rule remains threshold-based, now depending on posterior beliefs, and we bound the value of knowing the true distribution. In the robust regime, the agent has only price bounds and seeks worst-case protection; randomized threshold policies achieve optimal competitive-ratio and minimax-regret guarantees. We evaluate the proposed policies on Amazon price histories from Keepa (367 items, 48,933 timestamped observations) and examine their integration into language-model buying agents. The stationary and Bayesian policies perform competitively on mean normalized consumer surplus despite their stylized assumptions, while the robust policy performs best at the distribution's 10th percentile. Results suggest language models are better suited to selecting among regimes and calibration samples than to making buy-or-wait decisions directly.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.HC2026-07-15

Measuring How Students Rely on Generative AI in Academic Writing: Development and Multi-Source Validation of the Generative AI Reliance Types Scale (GenAI-RTS)

Shahin Hossain, Tukhbita Afroz Nawmi

As generative AI (GenAI) becomes increasingly embedded in undergraduate academic writing, how students rely on these tools, rather than simply whether they use them, has become a central question for learning, academic integrity, and educational equity. Existing measures of relia…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CYcs.AIcs.HC2026-07-15

Learning Engagement Assistant (LEA): Cross-Course Scalability and Classroom Evaluation of an Agentic AI Tutoring System

Teri Rumble, Javad Zarrin, P. George Lovell, Ruth Falconer

This paper is an extension of a paper presented at the ICAART 2026 conference, which introduced LEA (Learning Engagement Assistant), an adaptive AI tutoring agent combining course-specific Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with structured Knowledge Component (KC) models across…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.MAcs.AIcs.CYcs.HC2026-07-17

When Not to Automate: A Formal Protocol for Human Preservation in AI-Optimized Organizations

Jose Manuel de la Chica Rodriguez, Jairo Rodriguez Arias, Spyridon Chouliaras

Standard automation ROI misses four categories of systemic risk -- tacit knowledge erosion, resilience reduction, regulatory exposure, and socio-institutional capital degradation -- that affect long-term organizational performance. PHP-AIO (Protocol for Human Preservation in AI-O…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CYcs.HC2026-07-20

The Autonomous Agency Scale: A Behavioral Framework for Measuring Self-Directed Behavior in AI Systems

Samuel Presgraves

Existing AI measurement frameworks quantify cognitive capability, task automation, or catastrophic risk, but none measure autonomous agency: the extent to which a system behaves in a self-directed way. A system can saturate capability benchmarks while remaining entirely reactive,…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CYcs.HC2026-07-15

AI advice suppresses people's willingness to say "I don't know", even when the advice is wrong and accuracy is incentivized

Chiara Marcoccia, Walter Quattrociocchi, Valerio Capraro

Knowing when to say "I don't know" is fundamental to human judgment, yet AI assistants offer a fluent answer to almost any question. In five experiments (N = 3,132; four preregistered, one direct replication), participants answered difficult questions and could always decline to…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.AIcs.CYcs.ETcs.RO2026-07-14

Practical Judgment, Virtue, and Intuition in the Use of Opaque AI-Enabled Systems

Nathan G. Wood, Andrew P. Rebera

AI-enabled systems are seeing increasing deployment across numerous domains, with many being "black boxes" with respect to core functions and capabilities. I.e., many systems take inputs and give outputs, but without users having any ability to see how the former lead to the latt…

View free PDFSource page