CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AI2026-07-14

Isolation as a First-Class Principle for LLM-Agent System Safety: Concepts, Taxonomy, Challenges and Future Directions

Huihao Jing, Wenbin Hu, Shaojin Chen, Haochen Shi, Sirui Zhang, Hanyu Yang, Changxuan Fan, Zhongwei Xie, Hongyu Luo, Wun Yu Chan, Wei Fan, Haoran Li, Yangqiu Song

The capability of LLM agents to function as the ``brain'' of a system fundamentally expands the scope of analysis beyond a standalone model. Consequently, safety is no longer only about input--output content alignment. It also concerns system behavior and real-world execution outcomes. However, the current literature is fragmented across attack types, applications, and benchmarks. This makes it hard to explain why failures such as prompt injection, tool misuse, and memory poisoning often share the same structural cause, and how they spread through an agent workflow. In this survey, we treat isolation as a first-class principle for LLM-agent system safety. By isolation, we refer to the separation of user inputs, tool access, execution channels, inter-agent communication, and environment-originated context. We organize the literature with a boundary-centric taxonomy of five boundaries: user-agent, agent-tool, agent-execution, agent-agent, and system-environment. This view helps identify where the loss of isolation first occurs, how compromise propagates across boundaries, and which defenses are most relevant at each interface. We also summarize cross-boundary failure paths, discuss open challenges, and outline a research agenda for isolation-by-construction in future agent systems.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CRcs.AIcs.IRcs.LGcs.MA2026-07-08

Who Broke the System? Failure Localization in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems

Yufei Xia, Anjun Gao, Yueyang Quan, Zhuqing Liu, Minghong Fang

Large language model (LLM) based multi-agent systems enable complex problem solving through coordinated reasoning and action, but their distributed structure also introduces new challenges in diagnosing system-level failures. When an execution fails, identifying which agent is re…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.AIcs.HC2026-07-07

Security and Privacy in Agentic AI: Grand Challenges and Future Directions

Adam Jenkins, Agnieszka Kitkowska, Caterina Maidhof, Diego Paracuellos, Francesco Sovrano, Gonzalo Gabriel Mendez, et al.

We present key challenges and future research directions in the security and privacy of agentic AI, based on a horizon-scanning exercise that brought together thirty leading international experts from academia, industry, and government to engage in focused discussions and collabo…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-09

TRACE: A Two-Channel Robust Attribution Watermark via Complementary Embeddings for LLM-Agent Trajectories

Zheng Gao, Xiaoyu Li, Xiaoyan Feng, Jiaojiao Jiang, Yang Song, Yulei Sui, et al.

LLM agents reach users through resellers, who may rebrand a developer's agent or substitute a cheaper model. When provenance is disputed, attribution rests on the trajectory log (the record of tool calls, observations, and executed actions, not the model's reasoning), which the r…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CRcs.MA2026-07-08

Operational Reframing and Approval-Framed Delegation in Multi-Agent LLM Safety

Lifei Liu, Haoran Yu, Xiaochong Jiang, Su Wang, Pin Qian, Yihang Chen

Safety evaluations of multi-agent LLM systems often compare a direct prompt with a planner-executor pipeline and report the difference as a single "pipeline effect." We argue that this aggregate is difficult to interpret because it conflates three mechanisms: harmful intent may b…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.AIcs.IRcs.SI2026-07-03

Agentic and Generative AI for Open-Source Intelligence and Cyber Investigations: Taxonomy, Evaluation, Challenges, and Future Directions

Eduardo Almeida Palmieri, Mohamed Chahine Ghanem, Dipo Dunsin, Zubair Baig, Ed de Quincey, Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo

The rapid growth of publicly available digital information has rendered manual open-source intelligence (OSINT) analysis insufficient for modern intelligence, cybersecurity, and cyber investigation. Large language models (LLMs) and agentic AI systems, capable of tool use, multi-s…

View free PDFSource page