CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AI2026-07-16

Global Index on Responsible AI: 2026 Report

Rachel Adams, Fola Adeleke, Ayantola Alayande, Selamawit Engida Abdella, Ana Florido, Nicolás Grossman, Leah Junck

Grounded in human rights-based frameworks such as the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI, the Global Index on Responsible AI (GIRAI) examines how countries translate responsible AI commitments into enforceable protections, institutional capacity, and redress mechanisms. GIRAI 2026 assesses these across five dimensions: Inclusion and Diversity, Ethics and Sustainability, Labour and Skills, Trust and Safety, and AI Use in Public Service. A global network of 135 country-level researchers collected and assessed 68,138 data points on 38 indicators organised across three pillars: government AI policy and implementation (17 indicators), civil society engagement (5), enabling conditions (15), and documented cases of government deployment of unacceptable-risk AI systems. The data covers November 2023 to September 2025. A score of 100 is derived from the indicators to rank all countries. Findings show that while responsible AI governance is expanding, with 126 of 135 countries having at least one government policy or initiative across the 17 AI Policy indicators, this does not often translate into meaningful protection. For instance, Global South countries account for 203 of 306 new cases of indicators with frameworks since the first edition, yet 78% of their frameworks remain non-binding compared with 42% in the Global North. Government commitment to AI governance also does not extend to their own algorithms: whereas Transparency and Explainability is one of the strongest performing indicators, with 58% of countries having some framework, only 18% require Public Disclosure of Government Algorithms. Credible evidence of government deployment of unacceptable-risk AI systems was also found in 35 countries. These findings show that responsible AI governance must move beyond framework adoption toward enforceable rights-based protections, resourced oversight institutions, and accessible redress.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CYcs.AI2026-06-30

FLARE-AI: Flaw Reporting for AI

Shayne Longpre, Elaine Zhu, Carson Ezell, Avijit Ghosh, Sean McGregor, Kevin Paeth, et al.

Flaw reporting for deployed AI systems is fundamental to identifying system failures and improving AI safety. Yet the AI reporting ecosystem is fragmented: researchers who identify flaws often do not know what or where to report, and groups who receive reports rarely share them w…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CYcs.AIeess.SY2026-07-15

Unsafe at any AUC: Unlearned Lessons from Sociotechnical Disasters for Responsible AI

Joshua A. Kroll, Andrew Smart, R. Stuart Geiger, Abigail Z. Jacobs

As automated decision-making and data-driven technologies pervade society and are used to manage consequential outcomes, understanding the technology's capabilities, limitations, and attendant risks in context requires analysis of full sociotechnical systems. Sociotechnical analy…

View free PDFSource page
arxivecon.GNcs.AIcs.ARcs.CEcs.PF2026-07-08

Memory Scarcity, Open Models, and the Restructuring of the AI Industry, 2026-2030 -- A quantitative scenario analysis of inference economics, training-cost divergence, and infrastructure solvency

Satoshi Matsuoka

We analyze how four forces restructure the AI industry over 2026-2030: the DRAM/HBM price surge, frontier-capable open-weight models (GLM-5.2), rapid inference-efficiency gains (near-Shannon-limit KV-cache compression, lightweight local runtimes), and the entry of Meta and xAI in…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AI2026-07-13

Technical Report on the CVPR 2026@AdvML Workshop Challenge

Tianyuan Zhang, Zonglei Jing, Jiangfan Liu, Ligong Zhang, Ke Ma, Chengzhi Sun, et al.

Vision-language agents (VLAs) are increasingly used to interpret complex driving scenes and support safety-critical reasoning. This report presents the CVPR 2026@AdvML Workshop Challenge on adversarial multimodal attacks against autonomous-driving VLAs. Built on DriveLM-style mul…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.AI2026-07-21

Building Trust in Autonomous Commerce: A Verifiable Global Event Timeline and AI-Ready Fraud Intelligence Layer

Rajat Srivastava

Agentic commerce protocols such as AP2 and ACP define mechanisms for secure agent-initiated transactions but do not provide interoperable, tamper-evident auditability or verifiable temporal ordering of events across heterogeneous domains. This paper addresses these gaps by propos…

View free PDFSource page