CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AI2026-07-06

AgenticPD: A Stage-Aware Agentic Framework for Physical Design QoR Optimization

Shuo Ren, Zijin Cheng, Yaohui Han, Libo Shen, Leilei Jin, Wanting Tian, Rongliang Fu, Chao Wang, Bei Yu, Tsung-Yi Ho

Physical design quality-of-results~(QoR) optimization is hard and expensive. Choices made at one stage can help or hurt later stages. Each evaluation requires a costly EDA run through the full flow. While existing methods still treat optimization as flat parameter tuning or a LLM-based script generation task, we present AgenticPD, a stage-aware agentic framework for physical design QoR optimization. Instead of re-running the full flow after every trial, AgenticPD is organized around the stage boundaries of the physical design flow, where a Judge Agent navigates the search and stage-specialized agents make local decisions within their own stage using stage-local tools. Additionally, the agent harness in AgenticPD provides structured observations, execution history, and agent context management. As a result, the system can branch from prior intermediate states and reuse checkpoints to continue the optimization procedure, and every candidate is evaluated at the post-route signoff. Across these baselines, AgenticPD achieves strong post-route timing while remaining competitive in power and area.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIcs.HC2026-07-13

Designing Agent-Ready Websites for AI Web Agents: A Framework for Machine Readability, Actionability, and Decision Reliability

Said Elnaffar, Farzad Rashidi

Online shopping is increasingly shifting toward a model in which AI agents independently search for products, compare options, evaluate constraints, and carry out parts of the purchasing process for users. Website design must now support both human and agent-mediated interaction.…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-07-18

CLOSER-Bench: Evaluating Budgeted Cross-Stage Design Closure for Hardware Agents

Peilong Zhou, Zhirong Chen, Cangyuan Li, Haoyu Gao, Kaiyan Chang, Ziming Qu, et al.

Hardware engineering exposes coding agents to a form of long-horizon work that is difficult to capture with pass-at-k: progress is continuous, tool feedback is delayed and heterogeneous, and a backend failure may require revising RTL rather than tuning another physical-design par…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AI2026-07-17

PhysAgent: Reflective Agentic Physics Control for Physically Plausible Video Generation

Qirui Li, Jinkun Hao, Yibo Li, Ran Yi, Paul L. Rosin, Yu-Kun Lai

Recent advances in physics-grounded video generation leverage physics simulation as a physical prior to guide video synthesis toward physically plausible outcomes. The simulation process is controlled by physical specifications, which are typically generated by a vision-language…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ARcs.AI2026-07-30

ARES: Adaptive Reasoning-Effort Steering for PPA- and Cost-Aware RTL Optimization with LLM Agents

Stef Cuyckens, Mihaela Jivanescu, Jun Yin, Chao Fang, Marian Verhelst

Large language model (LLM) agents optimize the power, performance, and area (PPA) of register-transfer-level (RTL) designs by iterating over edits, synthesis, and PPA analysis, paying a dollar cost for every LLM call. Prior agents report the quality reached without its normalized…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CR2026-07-05

Agentic SABRE: An Uncertainty-Aware Neuro-Symbolic Multi-Agent Framework for Adaptive Ransomware Detection

Henry Kabuye, Biju Issac, Jeyamohan Neera

Ransomware has evolved into a complex, adaptive, and fast-moving adversary category in which static signatures and monolithic classifiers fail to generalise under concept drift, evasion, and behavioural polymorphism. In this paper, we present Agentic SABRE (Semantic-Behavioural A…

View free PDFSource page